Re: Nuclear decay post-detonation
From: Dave (noone_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 09/28/04
- Next message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Reaching Light Speed,"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Reaching Light Speed,"
- In reply to: AA Institute: "Nuclear decay post-detonation"
- Next in thread: AA Institute: "Re: Nuclear decay post-detonation"
- Reply: AA Institute: "Re: Nuclear decay post-detonation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:00:57 -0000
that was the idea behind the neutron bomb. kill people but not contaminate
the area.
"AA Institute" <abdul.ahad@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:adbf5bc1.0409280649.4f925b2f@posting.google.com...
> I'd like to know what options there are for ensuring that a nuclear
> missile doesn't leave the site where it's detonated radioactive after
> the blast.
> I think with conventional ICBMs the ground where they impact will be
> left radioactive for decades (if not longer), due to the long half
> lives of the the nuclear materials.
>
> So is it possible to build a nuclear warhead with a shorter half-life
> so that it doesn't leave too much radioactivity in its aftermath, but
> without compromising its destructive force?
>
> PS: This is a just a *scientific*, educational, exploratory research
> question... don't think too much of my plans with this please!
>
> Thanks
> AAI
- Next message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Reaching Light Speed,"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Reaching Light Speed,"
- In reply to: AA Institute: "Nuclear decay post-detonation"
- Next in thread: AA Institute: "Re: Nuclear decay post-detonation"
- Reply: AA Institute: "Re: Nuclear decay post-detonation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|