Re: paradox in quantum mechanics
From: Eugene Shubert (http://www.everythingimportant.org)
Date: 10/20/04
- Next message: Paul Draper: "Re: mass of bound system"
- Previous message: Cirbryn: "Re: *** Happens"
- In reply to: jsp: "paradox in quantum mechanics"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: paradox in quantum mechanics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:07:43 -0500
"jsp" <jupiterscientific2004b@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6583e4ad.0410200804.53c5f8cd@posting.google.com...
advertising
> http://www.jupiterscientific.org/sciinfo/index.html
> http://www.jupiterscientific.org/review/tfotc.html
Your page:
http://www.jupiterscientific.org/review/tfotc.html#quantumissues
says
"Special relativity destroyed the concept of ether. General relativity
resurrected it."
If we are to think of GR as a mechanistic theory, then I would be
forced to agree. The concept of an aether is required. Spacetime
is the aether.
Eugene Shubert
http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf
- Next message: Paul Draper: "Re: mass of bound system"
- Previous message: Cirbryn: "Re: *** Happens"
- In reply to: jsp: "paradox in quantum mechanics"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: paradox in quantum mechanics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]