Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!

From: David Thomson (news5_at_volantis.org)
Date: 12/27/04 

Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 19:22:54 -0600

"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com> wrote in
message news:oBFzd.8185$8e5.1249@fed1read07...
>> Those experiments are revealing EFFECTS of neutrinos on other substances.
>> They are not measuring or detecting the neutrinos themselves.
>
> A distinction without a difference. For some, neutrinos are Dark Matter,
> and the effects that Dark Matter is proposed to produce, neutrinos could
> produce.

It is a big difference. Seeing the a broken window tells you something
broke it. It doesn't necessarily tell you much about the object that caused
the damage. Regardless of how much data we collect on the effects of
neutrinos and dark matter, we're only going to have an interpretation of the
data, not a direct description of the object.

> I'd think there might be anomalous effects on rim stars, with a large flux
> of available neutrinos of *all* flavors...

Neutrinos are no more substantial than cup fulls of water. The water will
take the shape and volume of any cup. Neutrinos are merely quantities of
angular momentum caught between Aether units when subatomic particles bind.
When they unbind, the neutrino angular momentum gets shot out.

I show data that suggests the reason neutrinos disappear within the Earth is
because unstable isotopes can easily have captured dark matter (neutrinos)
knocked loose, thus causing radioactivity. The new, more stable isotopes
resulting from the decay process captures the extra dark matter or sends it
off in a different direction. So if the Earth were bombarded with an
increase in radiation (such as the building of nuclear power plants,
increased solar activity, or passing through a galactic cloud), then the
radiation within the Earth would also increase. This would increase the
temperature of the magma in locations where magma contains concentrations of
radioactive material, and thus increase the seismic and volcanic activity of
the Earth.

Right now we do have many nuclear power plants around the planet, we just
came out of a third consecutive highly energetic solar max, and five years
ago our solar system entered a galactic cloud. So naturally, I would
suggest we will see an increase in seismic and volcanic activity as a
result.

Dave

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
    ... Neutrinos do not explain dark matter, ... stable the neutrons will be. ... there are cavities in the atomic structure that allow for neutron ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
    ... Neutrinos do not explain dark matter, ... Atoms are composite particles, like protons and neutrons. ... > there are cavities in the atomic structure that allow for neutron ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
    ... >> are dark matter, ...The neutrino is captured dark matter that resides in ... I didn't say neutrinos formed all of dark matter. ... electrons and protons ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Dark matter/energy - is it real?
    ... You claimed dark matter would clump, because it would be cooled by ... "One of the most revealing criteria as to whether the Universe is dominated ... Neutrinos, as aforementioned, would have emerged from the Big Bang with such ... Gravitational interactions and gravity wave emissions. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)
  • Re: neutrino interaction
    ... >> Llanzlan Klazmon wrote: ... >>> Most neutrinos are produced in the cores of stars. ... Neutrinos are a type of dark matter but for various ... i was asking in what massive way nature can absorbe ...
    (sci.physics)