Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!

From: David Thomson (news5_at_volantis.org)
Date: 12/27/04 

Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 19:41:12 -0600

"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com> wrote in
message news:OHFzd.8231$8e5.5697@fed1read07...
>> You won't find gravity bending light ANYWHERE in the Universe.
>
> It is found in our solar system, in signalling to/from Venus. It is found
> in sightings of stars during a solar eclipse.

The light is bending, but it is not due to gravity. It is due to the
density of the body. As subatomic particles bind, they fold the Aether (and
capture dark matter.) As the Aether folds, it pulls in surround quantum
Aether units, just like a bowling ball on a flat rubber ***, except that
it is 3D.

This causes the path of light to follow a lensed Aether. It just turns out
that the nuclear binding force and the gravitational force are directly
proportional to each other.

>> The gravitational law is based on the force between two masses,
>
> Newton predicts no such effect on light.

That's exactly right, because the photon is massless.

>> and since photons have zero mass, the gravitational force is zero.
>
> Gravitational force is zero in GR anyway.

Then why are you saying that gravity bends light? The gravitational force
IS gravity. If the gravitational force is zero, then gravity does not bend
light.

>> Now if you really wanted to know how light bends around massive objects,
>> you might ask me for the answer, because I have it.
>
> No wonder people accuse science of being religion. David Thomson, the
> mystic.

I'm actually the one presenting the science here. I have fully quantified
the Aether, quantified how Aether folds to capture dark matter as neutrinos,
and provided a mathematically correct Unified Force Theory that properly
shows the relationship between the strong force and the gravitational force.
What do you call a science that does not have a Unified Force Theory, cannot
quantify the neutrino, ignores the existence of Aether, and says gravity can
bend light with a zero force?

>> As for dark matter, it exists mainly near massive objects.
>
> Most of it is in the intergalactic void. The balance is inside the
> visible rim of spiral galaxies.

No, actually, most of dark matter exists in the center of galaxies and near
massive objects. What looks like a void from our tiny human perception is
actually a densely packed group of stars.

>> There is more dark matter near Earth than there is in the emptiness of
>> space.
>
> Citation?

Neutrinos are dark matter. Neutrinos are released from beta decay.
Neutrinos get absorbed within the Earth and Sun, but not in the space in
between. I could provide citations for these observations, but I don't have
the time.

>> The Aether is what gives structure to the angular momentum of dark
>> matter by imparting the qualities of charges to it.
>
> DM has no charge. It interacts with both itself and normal matter via
> gravitation... not charge.

Dark matter has no charge, but the Aether does. When dark matter is
absorbed into the Aether, it picks up both electrostatic and electromagnetic
charge and becomes a subatomic particle. Charge is the basis for all stable
matter in the physical Universe.

Dave