Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!

From: Franz Heymann (notfranz.heymann_at_btopenworld.com)
Date: 12/27/04 

Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:22:22 +0000 (UTC)

"David Thomson" <news5@volantis.org> wrote in message
news:JtJzd.29$rx4.4042@news.uswest.net...

[snip]

> Regardless of how much data we collect on the effects of
> neutrinos and dark matter, we're only going to have an
interpretation of the
> data, not a direct description of the object

Please list those objects smaller that about 1 micron in average
diameter of which you can provide a "direct description".

If you are not aware that physicists have cognitive powers which allow
them to make deductions from their observations, you should not waste
your time waffling about the subject. How about becoming an exper at
playing with marbles instead?

[snip the crap]

Franz

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... > neutrinos and dark matter, we're only going to have an ... interpretation of the ... [snip the crap] ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... > neutrinos and dark matter, we're only going to have an ... interpretation of the ... [snip the crap] ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Big Bang -- visible
    ... >> to see before the CMBR? ... > It takes the Earth, and its mass, to convert the neutrino flux we have ... The real problem is that neutrinos from the big bang have ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Security Guard - God Guided Me And Protected Me
    ... It's not what Jesus ... ALL gotten it wrong on the Law/Christ interpretation because a bunch ... outrageous moments of a Gay Pride parade? ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: What we listen for
    ... > I don't know why you think my sentence implies that the evocation of ... So I don't have a problem with differing interpretations, ... interpretation ...
    (rec.music.compose)