Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!

From: Bill Hobba (bhobba_at_rubbish.net.au)
Date: 12/27/04 

Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 11:53:11 GMT

"David Thomson" <news5@volantis.org> wrote in message
news:YVJzd.31$rx4.4162@news.uswest.net...
> "Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> news:cqnen0$t5$3@titan.btinternet.com...
> > Your understanding of gravitation is at least as flawed as your
> > understanding of the rest of physics.
> > Guess what! The gravitational force acts on energy.
>
> Your understanding of energy is at least as flawed as your understanding
of
> the rest of physics. Guess what! Energy is merely a unit of work.

Learn some 20th century physics - energy is the conserved Noether current
associated with time symmetry. See
http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath564/kmath564.htm.

> There
> is nothing for gravitational force to act on. You might as well say that
> force acts on velocity and resistance.

First gravity is not a force - it is space-time curvature. Secondly who
said it acts on anything? - light is 'curved' by gravity for precisely the
same reason it travels in straight lines in an inertial frame.

>
> The gravitational force can act only on mass.
>

Assuming by acts you mean it follows a curved path when gravity is present
then experiment shows it does.

> Now, even according to your
> understanding of physics, the photon has zero mass. If the photon has
zero
> mass, then it has zero energy, because energy is equal to mass times the
> speed of light squared, as you see it.

See
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/ParticleAndNuclear/photon_mass.html.
In units c = 1 E2 = M2 + P2. Now when M = 0 what does that make E? - even
an idiot like you should be able to figure that one out - but judging from
what you write maybe not.

>
> >> Now if you really
> >> wanted to know how light bends around massive objects, you might ask
> >> me for the answer, because I have it.
> >
> > Too late. I already know that light travels along a geodesic.
>
> No you don't. Your physics has denied the existence of Aether. There is
> nothing for you to call a geodesic.

I guess the principle of maximal time is all in physicists imagination
then - even when it is simply a generalization of Newton's first law. Hey
David why do free particles move at constant velocity in an inertial
frame? - is that because of your marvelous aether as well? - after all there
is nothing compelling it to do that is there? something must cause it? - so
I guess classical mechanics is up the creek as well. We are obviously in a
real bad way - or maybe, just maybe, here is a wild idea - you have no idea
what you are talking about.

Bill

> But if you are going to accept the
> geodesic, then you have to accept the full quantification of the Aether
and
> the laws of physics that results from it. In that case, I have the
correct
> explanation for how the geodesic forms.
>
> >> As for dark matter, it exists mainly near massive objects. There is
> > more
> >> dark matter near Earth than there is in the emptiness of space. But
> > it
> >> can't be detected because dark matter exists outside of the Aether.
> > The
> >> Aether is what gives structure to the angular momentum of dark
> > matter by
> >> imparting the qualities of charges to it.
> >
> > You don't know what you are talking about.
>
> You just enjoy knocking people. How many times have you told someone that
> they didn't have a theory until they could quantify it? Now that I have
> presented a fully quantified Aether Physics Model, why don't you take the
> time to read it?
>
> Dave
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Article: A Century of Einstein
    ... >> I may accelerate the stars first in one direction, ... >> There is no difference in physics depending of the acceleration ... The force of gravity becomes illustrated as simple energetic ... strings of virtual gravitational energy in every line connecting ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Article: A Century of Einstein
    ... >> I may accelerate the stars first in one direction, ... >> There is no difference in physics depending of the acceleration ... The force of gravity becomes illustrated as simple energetic ... strings of virtual gravitational energy in every line connecting ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... >> understanding of the rest of physics. ... The gravitational force acts on energy. ... First gravity is not a force - it is space-time curvature. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... >> understanding of the rest of physics. ... The gravitational force acts on energy. ... First gravity is not a force - it is space-time curvature. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Einsteins idea is right
    ... energy increases, Light cannot change velocity so the frequency rises ... what you are saying is violating the laws of physics. ... In gravity, the gravitational time ... is no "physical law" to apply other than the relevant physical theory. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)