Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 12/28/04
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- In reply to: David Thomson: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Next in thread: David Thomson: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Reply: David Thomson: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:02:26 -0500
David Thomson wrote:
> Of course not. The Aether IS space-time. The only effect warped Aether has
> on light is to bend its path. As far as the light knows, it's going in a
> straight line.
If this is so, all you have done is to slap a label on something. The
-real- aether, the kind that Maxwell thought exists lives IN space and
has visco-elastic mechanical properties.
All you are doing is playing vacuous word games.
Now if you really want to do scientific aether, read Ilja Schmelzer's
stuff. He does -real- physics. I am not sufficiently expert to know if
he theory is viable, but I can tell you it is genuine physics, be it
right or wrong. Go look up his stuff on arxiv.rog and see what a real
variant theory might look like.
Your juvenile mess of ninth grade algebra is nothing. It is a waste of
time. It is a fraud.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- In reply to: David Thomson: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Next in thread: David Thomson: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Reply: David Thomson: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
