Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!

From: David Thomson (news5_at_volantis.org)
Date: 01/04/05 

Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:12:51 -0600

"Bjoern Feuerbacher" <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message
news:cre0kc$flm$7@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de...
>> It's not trivial. It's proof that E does not equal m.
>
> It's not a proof of that. Why on earth do you think so?

As I pointed out in a previous message, you cannot change one side of the
equation without changing the other side of the equation. Otherwise you
won't have an equality, or you didn't start from one to begin with.

>> E cannot be converted to m.
>
> Yes, it can.

In fantasies maybe, but not by using real math.

>> The whole mass/energy paradigm is a fraud.
>
> Oh, so nuclear bombs do not exist? No particles were ever created
> in accelerators?

Since when does bad math translate into a nuclear bomb or particle
collisions? The math is theory, the experiment yields data. The data is
not the theory, nor does it come from the theory. The data comes from the
real world experiment.

The theory is incorrect, even if it is contorted to predict the correct data
to an experiment. What this means is that there is likely a correct theory
that predicts the correct data, and we should be looking for it. That is
what the Aether Physics Model is all about. It is the correct theory that
predicts the correct data.

Have you ever examined the amu formula and the nuclear binding energy
equations carefully? It is riddled with inconsistency and fudged in order
to produce correlations to the data. I often wonder whether the nuclear
binding energy data is actually measured for most isotopes, or merely
calculated. When you closesly examine the amu formula and the nuclear
binding energy equation you clearly realize that any correct prediction is
either entirely coincidental or the data must be fudged.

Do you know what I'm talking about, or do I need to spell this out for you?

Dave

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... but not by using real math. ... Since when does bad math translate into a nuclear bomb or particle ... even if it is contorted to predict the correct data ... Have you ever examined the amu formula and the nuclear binding energy ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... but not by using real math. ... Since when does bad math translate into a nuclear bomb or particle ... even if it is contorted to predict the correct data ... Have you ever examined the amu formula and the nuclear binding energy ...
    (sci.physics)
Quantcast