Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress....
From: kenseto (kenseto_at_erinet.com)
Date: 02/17/05
- Next message: kenseto: "Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress...."
- Previous message: Jay R. Yablon: "Electron mass of .511 MeV, and WHY we observe are multiple mass-distinguished Fermion generations"
- In reply to: A.S.: "Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress...."
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:58:23 GMT
"A.S." <arnoldschrod68@go.com> wrote in message
news:1108596028.959708.69900@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
> bryant_j_j@yahoo.com wrote:
> > err, but you missed or forgot about the posting where Landle admits
> > that he is Caltechdude and he admits changing his nicks, it is not
> > merely nttp posting addresses. you can check one of the threads that
> > start off with Landle and then he swithches to What is Qi. From that
> > point on it is exactly the same guy. i could point to the specific
> > postings if you'd like but i don't know how to do it with this new
> > Google Groups thing. based on Landle's own admission, he is indeed
> > Caltechdude, Cinquirer and What is Qi. He is also Qion since the
> > nttp-posting address for Qion is exactly the same as What is Qi.
> >
> > look, i am just trying to do you a favor here, so you don't repeat
> > yourself to the same guy masquerading as someone else and reparting
> the
> > same pathetic attempt to get you to "debunk" a specific crank
> theories.
> >
> >
> > as for A.S., at first i was not convinced that he is indeed
> > Caltechdude, Landle, etc because like you his style at first looked
> > different. but then as time went on his style and sentences became
> more
> > and more like that of Landle and his zillion other nicks. i the
> > crosschecked the nttp posting ip's and found that the one A.S. is
> using
> > is that of Qion or What is Qi. why don't you just ask you buddy to
> tell
> > you honestly if he is indeed all these other people. IMO, they are,
> > unless many people are using the same account (i.e. a mafia of pranic
> > healers taking turns logging in as A.S. and Qion, etc).
> >
> > bye.
>
>
>
> The "bizarre reason" can be explained in a simple way.
>
> Bryan, do you notice that when people associate a message
> or thread as started by Qion like this thread (owing to your
> replying to it immediately and stamping the "Qion" seal).
> There are few replies. So how could you expect Qion to start a
> thread on physics subjects unrelated to qi and expecting people
> to reply when just reading the "qi" word can already turn them
> off. This is likely the main reason Qion has to change
> nicks just to have a normal discussion of physics related
> thread. His changing nicks don't involve attacking people
> personality which would have made it bad had it been so.
>
> By replying to this message and associating it to Qion or
> Qi. You destroyed the thread (this would also occur if
> he posted it using Qion). This is why Ken Seto is
> not here to defend himself for the atomic model
> inconsistency commented by Bjoern
Hey A.S. This is the first time I notice this thread. I made comments on
Bjoern's comments today..
>
> In the other thread "Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?" posted
> by me. You didn't associate it to "Qion" so the discussion
> is alive. So you now undertand the "bizarre reason" is just
> a simple one.
I was responding in the thread "Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
Ken Seto
- Next message: kenseto: "Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress...."
- Previous message: Jay R. Yablon: "Electron mass of .511 MeV, and WHY we observe are multiple mass-distinguished Fermion generations"
- In reply to: A.S.: "Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress...."
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
