Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?)
From: Androcles (Androcles_at_)
Date: 02/17/05
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?)"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?)"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?)"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?)"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:55:54 GMT
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:4214B2B5.2410F3C4@hate.spam.net...
> Q-on wrote:
> [snip 330 lines of crap]
>
>> In seeking a
>> conceptual model for the ether, perhaps scientists would do well
>> to turn t o the notion of a transmuting ether, such as that
>> described in ancient myth and lore or more explicitly explored
>> through Model G of subquantum kinetics.
>
> Idiot.
>
[snip crap]
Idiot.
Androcles
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?)"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?)"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?)"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?)"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|