Re: The Brilliance of Our Teachers
akalaniz_at_hotmail.com
Date: 03/22/05
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Anyone working with (bio)physics? I got to share something I wished I never would."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Mar 2005 13:30:29 -0800
Please sir, why haven't you marketed your perpetual motion machine that
you have in your webpage? Or is it that, as I explained to you, your
Maxwell demon isn't quite up to snuff?
Sorry your math skills suck. How, without advanced mathematics, would
you develop, say, GPS technology which uses general relativity? How
about the precession of the perehelion of Mercury without violating
observational data. The sun isn't oblate enough for Newtonian gravity
to work...must use Einstein's general relativity.
How without relativistic quantum mechnanics would you model the Lamb
shift and hordes of other observable phenomena?
Please...PLEASE!...put up or shut up. Pick all those phenomena that
have been successfully modeled thanks to special relativity (like
applications of QED physics to atomic spectra) and general relativity
with applications such as GPS and give me YOUR extremely simplified
model. Now, give me one model for each phenomena. QED--a single
theory--models gobs of phenomemology. Give me a few models, say one to
replace QED and one to replace GR that jive with experiment as well as
or better than QED and general relativity.
Sorry, you haven't killed the Jew Einstein.
AA PhD
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Anyone working with (bio)physics? I got to share something I wished I never would."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
