Re: The Brilliance of Our Teachers

akalaniz_at_hotmail.com
Date: 03/25/05 

Date: 24 Mar 2005 16:23:19 -0800

I still await your presenting the world how your brilliant, high school
level approach to science can yield the correct precession of the
perehelion of Mercury, the correct bending of light by the sun, the
correct delay in radar echos without the heavy, insensible mathematics
of tensor calculus in a non-Riemannian geometry. Or for that matter,
show us how a brilliant high school kid could calculate the Lamb shift
without any abstruce QED. It would go a long way in showing me that
yes, indeed, physicists are full of *** hiding behind strange,
bull*** mathematics. How about taking the particle physics spectrum
as known in 1950 and predicting, without group theory, the existence of
other particles? Can you do that with algebra? Better yet, live up to
your promise that you will rebut any of your arguments. You have on
your web page a claim of having designed a perpetual motion machine of
the second kind. I have posted where you are wrong. Where is your
rebuttle? And why, if I'm wrong, haven't you marketed this machine
that can produce useful work without any input of energy?

Nice of you to quote A. Einstein, but post under Einsteinhoax. What is
it? Are you with him or against him?

AA PhD