Re: Sub-atomic particle structures
- From: "Chris" <nimbo@(no-spam)ukonline.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 23:52:09 GMT
MMMM dunno. What is QCD or QED? Never undersood these initials?
Well I don't really believe in black holes, and the diameter I quote is for
the orbit of a path of light bent round to be in circular orbit.
I had no idea that Protons decay or that neutrons fall apart. In fact my
theory has no place for neutrons except as a composite of a trapped positive
looping gamma and a trapped negatively looping gamma.
I said the idea was incomplete, but it does unify various bits.
Well don't black holes exist at every galactic center and at many other
places too.
In a massive black hole the individual particles get untied and loose their
identity and before they reach the event horizon they decompose into their
component gamma rays which slowly escape the black hole, which is why it
cannot form in the first place, matter cannot pass the event horizon. It is
no use changing the co-ordinates to an exponential scale so that you can
calculate an internal orbit because it still takes infinite time to pass the
event horizon. There is no singularity the closest thing to it is the event
horizon the rest is mathematical fiction.
Particles are created in particle physics as a result of transisions as
photons are created in atomic electron physics when electrons change energy.
In fact it is exactly the same process except that the transisitions in
particle physics are high enough in energy to get trapped in these little
self gravity traps.
Color in particles is a physicist's joke to make a set of transitions into
something explicable and predictable, really these trasitions form series
like the balmer series. I'm sure that to calculate properly a real set of
mathematical equations representing the behaviour of trapped gammas and
their interaction with each other would be needed. In fact color was my
joke when a worked at CERN in the 70's as an assistant, as were other jokes
that were not used. I think we joked about quarks too. But I can't
remember. It was all to do with making sense of things we could not see and
was not meant to be taken seriously. How strange! I said once and a quantum
series was then called strangeness. It is likely that all these properties
are really series associated with quantum numbers of the complicated
behaviour of the trapped gamma. If it could be properly calculated it would
make it easier to predict the result of energetic particle collisions.
The mini black holes of the tron do not collect because of the repulsion due
to their charge and when they do get too close then nuclear reactions take
place and new particles form and escape. As we observe. Their trapped
gammas interact and new gammas form due to non-linearity of gamma
interaction when the field is so high that gravity is important (of the same
order).
OK OK my theory is too simple, but then it only me...
My problem has always been due to the one sentence in the bible about marked
men - they are an anathema to god... so nothing they produce is any good, it
can only be evil and wrong.
I'm an anathema to God. Unfit for the temple of God. So all my physics is
wrong.
Jesus did not say that! I'm a follower of Jesus.
Chris.
"Ranando King" <rk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:424d8d0e_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ... and that's the fundamental problem with the theory. QCD and QED
> wouldn't
> even appear to work if particles were extremely small black holes. What's
> more, particles couldn't decay if they were black holes. Neutrons would
> never "fall apart" when on their own. The background radiation of the
> universe wouldn't exist since all of that energy would have gone into
> feeding these black hole particles. Gravity is not the solution
>
> R.
>
>
> "Chris" <nimbo@(no-spam)ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:EK53e.7314$r47.4836@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Hello Ranando King,
>>
>> Well, the tron is really a black hole.... The diameter is the
>> swartzchild
>> diameter for an electron, about 1E-57 meter.
>>
>> At this diameter the gravity due electronic mass is sufficient to prevent
>> any electric waves propagating. That is all the theory is, the tron is
> just
>> trapped light.
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>> "Ranando King" <rk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:424c7ef8$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > "Chris" <nimbo@(no-spam)ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
>> > news:TuF2e.4500$C12.1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> Hello.
>> >>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- References:
- Re: Sub-atomic particle structures
- From: Chris
- Re: Sub-atomic particle structures
- From: Ranando King
- Re: Sub-atomic particle structures
- Prev by Date: Re: Sub-atomic particle structures
- Next by Date: wave / particle duality
- Previous by thread: Re: Sub-atomic particle structures
- Next by thread: Re: Sub-atomic particle structures
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
