Re: Everything Is Moving


Ranando King wrote:
> "drnolittle" <bigbadbarry@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1116690312.884550.239590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > See if I'm thinking on the right track here
> >
> > Everything in the universe is moving always.
> >
> > Some so small, we cannot measure, or see. Like a rock.
> > but at a certain zoom, movement can be seen.
> >
> > Question: Is everything, absolutely everything round or constructed
of
> > round things.
> >
> > Particles appear to be round, atoms, and so forth.
> >
> > Me?, Im made of up a bunch of charged spheres right?
> >
> > Man I hope I have not showed all my ignorance at one time.
> >
>
> If you can swallow Quantum Physics, then no it's not all charged
spheres.
> Everything down to the particles looks spherical, but once you get
the
> particles themselves, things begin to look hazy. So for now, until we
find
> more accurate detection methods, it's better and more accurate to say
that
> at the bottom, it's all charged clouds. Clouds of what? No human
knows.
>
> R.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"No human knows", is NOT entirely correct. Using a new type of physics
called: "REALITY PHYSICS" we are able to prove that the mass and
physical configuration of all Fermion subatomic particles is actually
formed from the: "ANGULAR MOMENTUM OF PHOTON SPIN", i.e. all matter is
made of "spinning light". The fairly simple mathematical proof can be
found on pages 38-41 of my book entitled: "FROZEN LIGHT!" which is
avaliable on my website at:

> www.realityphysics.com <

if you are interested.

Also on this website is an article entitled: "The Complete Disproof Of
Relativity and Current Quantum Mechanics", which reveals how, using
"Reality Physics", we can now calculate the CORRECT values of the
standing electron pilot waves of the atom using the de Broglie Equation
(relating a moving particle's wavelength to its momentum), whereas with
current QM and Relativity, we can not.

Reality Physics also allows us, for the first time in the history of
physics, to reveal how "Time Dilation" (as used by Einstein in Special
Relativity) is also used to structure the atom, something current
Theoretical Physics also can not do, even though Time Dilation and the
Bohr Hydrogen Atom originated within Theroetical Physics to begin with.

Reality Physics, as opposed to Theoretical Physics, uses an "active"
background reference for motion, not the "static" background reference
as misassumed throughout Theoretical Physics academia today. What this
actually means is that the universe is "continually being formed" as
opposed to just continually existing linearly from one moment to the
next in time which, of course, totally agrees with your begining
statement that: "Everything in the universe is always moving", and it
is this continual motion that furnishes the "drive-action" to spin the
photon into a Fermion.

The concept of a "active", as opposed to a "static" universe, is a
TOTALLY new idea in physics and it will be a while before it is
understood and accepted even though there is direct, absolute proof
thst it is totally correct.

All opinions and comments welcome.

all the best,

Jeff Lee CENTER FOR REALITY PHYSICS

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: That Minkowski time intervals cannot be current in both frames.
    ... When you look at something I call a wave, what rule do you use to decide ... Sound, water crashing on the shore, riding on a rollercoaster, ... This is a moving graph, and so we can measure the frequency ... things which a lot of physics students take a long ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Problem with Einsteins Train Thought Experiment
    ... object is not moving directly towards the observer. ... There is no physics in the thought experiment. ... laws of motion take the same form in all inertial frames. ... relativity by asserting that all laws of physics take the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: That Minkowski time intervals cannot be current in both frames.
    ... When you look at something I call a wave, what rule do you use to ... second of energy (as sound or electromagnetic radiation) in the ... Yes, but your wave is moving in space and time both, and you ... With a cleaner theory that works, you could get a new physics ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: That Minkowski time intervals cannot be current in both frames.
    ... When you look at something I call a wave, what rule do you use to ... Yes, but your wave is moving in space and time both, and you ... With a cleaner theory that works, you could get a new physics ... where v and u are speeds relative to the AIR. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... fundamental part of physics since at least the time of Newton. ... I don't reject Galilean relativity, ... What my transformation predicts is that a moving stick is contracted ... but forgetting that the rest frame remains S, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading