Re: Everything Is Moving

Ok. This'll be my last post on this thread because I already see where it is
going, some place I don't want to go.

"Jeff" <JLeeCforRP@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1116981838.637516.260070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> Ranando,
>
> You are still misassming, as do most all Theoretical Physicists today,
> that the universe is "STATIC", that is to say, it only exists linearly
> from one omment to the next in time. Using an "ACTIVE" universe (that
> is "continually being formed" , as revealed with Reality Physics),
> energy and matter are shown to actually be two different forms of the
> same thing, just separated by: "c^2", as revealed by Einstein's famous
> equation, and matter is made of "spinning light": i.e., the "angular
> momentum of photon spin".
>
<snipped for brevity>

It's nice to see people thinking outside the box. That's always a good
thing. However, if you think this new "Reality Physics" is verifyably
correct, then your first step isn't to argue me and other in this newsgroup
to the floor, but rather to take your formulas and theory to the public in
the form of a paper to be submitted for peer review. If you've actually got
something good that produces verifyable predictions, say these "pilot wave"
calculations you were taunting me with, then they will be tested. Otherwise,
if there's nothing new predicted by your model, then expect that it will be
thrown away as rubbish.

Know this. Physicists are notoriously complacent and somewhat arrogant by
nature. Consider that the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox showed that
Quantum Physics is at least either incomplete or incorrect. Einstein's
conversations with Shroedinger further showed this truth without resorting
to the questionable formalities introduced by Podolsky. And yet, particle
physicists still insist that the truth is that nature is RANDOM on it's most
fundamental level instead of simply chalking the aparent randomness to the
current limitation of human knowledge and capability as was always done in
classical mechanics. So to you I say this: submit your paper and good luck.

R.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Time for a photon.
    ... on a shift-error. ... It is not physicists who have made the ... the entire history of science can be ... Less than truth is a lie. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Time for a photon.
    ... -- to "your understanding of science isn't correct," when you hand out a "cover your ASSumptions" definition of science that is excellent dialectic, but useless science, when even you know that science can, in fact, answer my damn question if it wants to. ... on a shift-error. ... today's physicists have made a shift error, ... Less than truth is a lie. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: AETHER / OR
    ... Modern physicists no longer struggle to find ... Without struggle for truth, there would be no ... don't go to Church. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Physics and Philosophy
    ... GSS wrote: ... >> truth which subject themselves to the scientific method. ... the best physicists are the ones that do not ... >> Philosophers, on the other hand, are free to play in arenas where truth ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation
    ... >>> Are you saying that you expect physicists to be the purveyers of truth ... the universe doesn't know what an explanation is; ... Reality is basically particles in motion. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)