Re: Understanding the HUP
- From: "Ranando King" <rk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:05:03 -0500
"Y.Porat" <maporat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1124861598.637801.125040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> anyway
> too much importance was given to the HUP
> in many cases hand waving with it even if not relevant
>
> and i showed that it can be bypassed by other knowledge
>
> and even *should be bypassed by other experimental knowledge*-
> if you want to make some progress in physics .
>
> ATB
> Y.Porat
> ----------------------
>
I agree that too much importance is lain on the HUP. Do to this indulgance,
many misunderstandings proliferate among scientists and hobbyists on issues
involving the HUP. However, the HUP is not bypassable. No matter how
accurate equipment becomes, there will always be a limit to how precise a
measurement can be when certain other measurements are made. That doesn't
mean that you cannot infer some things based on the information you can get,
but it does limit your ability to prove those inferences directly in
measurement.
R.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: Understanding the HUP
- From: Y.Porat
- cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- References:
- Understanding the HUP
- From: Ranando King
- Re: Understanding the HUP
- From: FrediFizzx
- Re: Understanding the HUP
- From: Ranando King
- Re: Understanding the HUP
- From: FrediFizzx
- Re: Understanding the HUP
- From: Y.Porat
- Understanding the HUP
- Prev by Date: Re: Understanding the HUP
- Next by Date: Re: Understanding the HUP
- Previous by thread: Re: Understanding the HUP
- Next by thread: Re: Understanding the HUP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading