cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- From: "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Aug 2005 13:13:24 -0700
Ranando King wrote:
> I agree that too much importance is lain on the HUP. Do to this indulgance,
> many misunderstandings proliferate among scientists and hobbyists on issues
> involving the HUP. However, the HUP is not bypassable. No matter how
> accurate equipment becomes, there will always be a limit to how precise a
> measurement can be when certain other measurements are made. That doesn't
> mean that you cannot infer some things based on the information you can get,
> but it does limit your ability to prove those inferences directly in
> measurement.
Do -> Due
Cheat the HUP:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/The_Discipline_Group/message/12206
http://www.npl.washington.edu/AV/altvw53.html
-Aut
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- From: Ranando King
- Re: cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- References:
- Understanding the HUP
- From: Ranando King
- Re: Understanding the HUP
- From: Ranando King
- Re: Understanding the HUP
- From: FrediFizzx
- Re: Understanding the HUP
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: Understanding the HUP
- From: Ranando King
- Understanding the HUP
- Prev by Date: Re: Focused Beam Fusion
- Next by Date: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics
- Previous by thread: Re: Understanding the HUP
- Next by thread: Re: cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|