Re: cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- From: "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Aug 2005 21:16:04 -0700
Ranando King wrote:
> No offense Autymn, but little is to be gained from your constant attempts at
> being an English teacher in this newsgroup. All but too often I've seen you
no point in your message
> post little more than a grammar correction and an insult. My understanding
> of the English language as used in the US is comprehensive enough to ensure
> that I get my point across whether or not my statements include typos. So
> please, refrain from playing editor and stick to the discussion of physics.
I refrain from nothing.
> The simple answer to your question is no. The first thing that you have to
> consider is that a photon is not an actual particle per se, but rather the
> simple physics notation for a single cycle of energy released as an EM wave.
> When an actual particle, preferably one that participates in EM
> interactions, especially an electron, encounters a photon, it absorbs the
> photon.
I know about that, which takes you to the squeezed state concept in my
second link, that measures a particle more precisely than the simple
HUP expression allows at the expense of fase information.
> So, if multiple photons met a particle, the photons themselves having a net
> 0 momentum, indeed there would be no net momentum change in the encountered
> particle. HOWEVER, in order to do such a thing, the photons would have to be
> targeted and timed in such a way that they meet the particle simultaneously.
> Any time delay at all between the encounters and the particle will have
> incurred a change in momentum.
Read the rest of the thread about cancelling this side-effect.
> To do such a precise targeting in an experiment would require knowledge of
> where the particle is and where it is going to a high degree of accuracy,
> i.e. precise knowledge of position and momentum simultaneously. So, in order
> to "cheat the HUP", you would need knowledge that violates the HUP.
Foreknowledge or hindknowledge will do it.
-Aut
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- From: Ranando King
- Re: cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- References:
- Understanding the HUP
- From: Ranando King
- Re: Understanding the HUP
- From: FrediFizzx
- Re: Understanding the HUP
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: Understanding the HUP
- From: Ranando King
- cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- From: Ranando King
- Understanding the HUP
- Prev by Date: Re: Focused Beam Fusion
- Next by Date: Re: cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- Previous by thread: Re: cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- Next by thread: Re: cheating (Re: Understanding the HUP)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|