"Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"

"Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"

Basis physics texts define acceleration as the second
derivative of position with respect to time (d^2*L/dT^2) or, in more
straight
forward language as the rate of change of the rate of change of position
with
respect to time. This experienced directly when one is in an automobile
which is
increasing its speed. The speed, which is the distance traveled in a given
time,
increases as time passes and, for a constant acceleration, the distance
traveled
increases in proportion to the square of the elapsed time.

When one considers gravitational an unfortunate semantic
problem arises. Quite often the force applied to the seat of your pants by
your
chair is asserted to be the acceleration of gravity. This assertion is false
and
apparently leads to confusion. The force one feels is not the acceleration
of
gravity but rather is the force which would produce the downward
acceleration
(the second derivative of elevation with respect to time) which we call free
fall. The force you feel against the chair a force which opposes the force
of
gravity, it is not the acceleration of gravity. This acceleration only
occurs
when you are in free fall and hence cannot sense the force of gravity,

It is this careless of definition which allows theoretical
physicists to assert that there is no force of gravity an what we consider
to be
the force of gravity occurs because the chair restricts you from following a
null geodesic path around the center of the Earth. What the theoreticians
have
done is to combine two independent effects which interact (inertial and
gravitational acceleration) into a single entity which they falsely assert
to be
fundamental.

Newton's Second Law of Motion asserts that for every action
there is an equal and opposite reaction. That is to say that for a force to
exist there must be an opposing force equal in magnitude and opposite
direction.
Modern physicists admit of only two exceptions to this rule, the force
exerted
during inertial acceleration and the force exerted by a gravitational field.
Since these forces supposedly have nothing to sustain them they are named
"fictitious forces". If however, one admitted the existence of the classical
Aether, these forces would no longer need to be considered "fictitious",
they
would exist as simple pushes or pulls against that Aether. It is too bad
that
modern physics has falsely asserted that the non-existence of the Aether has
been proven. if the classical Aether existed the answers to many puzzles
would
be apparent.

The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax/hoax.htm ("The Einstein Hoax" {1997});
http://einsteinhoax/gravity.htm; ("Gravity" {1987}); and
http://einsteinhoax/relcor.htm ("Corrections to Special Relativity" {1997}).
EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE
WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND
IT MUST BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm .

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not
monitored on a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the
same
courtesy as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of
our
parts, please do not raise objections that are not related to material that
you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:- einsteinhoax@xxxxxxx

The material at the Website has been posted continuously for
over 5 years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF
THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals
who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without questioning it.
If
anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered,
the
material at the Website will be withdrawn. Challenges to date have revealed
only
the responder's inadequacy with one exception for which a correction was
provided.


.