"The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"

"The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"

Observations made in the field of Quantum Physics have already
established that the concept that space and time are different aspects of
the
same entity - "space-time" is flawed. This concept was based on the
recognition
that the Lorentz Transformations resulting from velocity and our inability
to
transmit information faster than the velocity of light made it impossible to
establish our absolute velocity through space observationally. Physicists
who
were more enamored with mathematical elegance than with establishing a
better
understanding of the way the Universe works extended that impossibility to
generate the belief that an absolute velocity did not exist! This leads to
logical contradictions, as Dr. Einstein recognized instinctively, causing
him to
resist the idea of "space-time" for about 25 years after the publication of
Special Relativity and asserting that the "space-time" concept required the
existence of an infinite number of Aethers!

Lately, Quantum physicist have made observations which
demonstrate that, of the two current explanations of quantum theory, the one
which requires that the velocity of propagation of quantum effects be
infinite
velocity rather than being limited to the velocity of light, is consistent
with
the results of observation. Experiments have shown that the velocity of the
coupling of the polarization angle (the quantum number of the photon) of
"paired
photons" occurs at a velocity of at least four times the velocity of light
and
perhaps at an infinite velocity. Such a coupling velocity prevents
physicists
from hiding behind the idea that there is no absolute velocity reference
frame
and forcibly re-establishes the idea of Aether and demolishes the idea of
"space-time" as other than as a conventional mathematical abstraction.

The idea that information can travel at a velocity greater
than the velocity of light is not inconsistent with the requirements of
Special
Relativity. If one examines all of the conventional means of transmission of
information one finds that they involve the transmission of energy (e.g.-
light
signals, radio signals, particle transmission, etc). If one examines the
Lorentz
Transformation for energy (F-L-T system of units), one finds that the units
of
energy are the product of the Lorentz Transformations Force and for Length.
Since the Lorentz Transformation for Force (on axis) is unity, the Lorentz
Transformation for Energy is equal to the Transformation for Length and is
1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5). This transformation becomes infinite at the velocity of
light and becomes imaginary at velocities above the velocity of light.
Clearly,
no observable process which involves energy can proceed faster than the
velocity
of light!

The limitation imposed on the velocity of energy propagation
does not apply to the velocity of propagation of the polarization angle of
"paired photons". Since changing the polarization angle of a photon does not
change its energy content, the limitation that Special Relativity imposes on
the
transmission of energy does not apply. To see how Special Relativity does
impose
a velocity limitation on the propagations of the polarization angle of
"paired
photons" one must apply the Lorentz Transformation for Angle to the problem.
Angle is measured as the length along an arc divided by the radius of that
arc.
As a result, the Lorentz Transformation for Angle is
(1-V^2/C^2)/(1-V^2/C^2),
and is equal to unity at all velocities between +/-C! A simple calculus
procedure shows that the Transformation for Angle remains unity even at the
velocity of light, where the Transformation for Energy becomes Infinite!.
Unlike
the Transformation for Energy, at velocities above that of light, the
Transformation for Angle does not become imaginary. It retains its value of
unity for all velocities. From this it seems reasonable to conclude that the
velocity limit for the propagation of polarization angle of such photons is
infinity. It is the writer's belief that this results applies to all quantum
numbers and that the current interpretation of Quantum Theory which asserts
that
quantum effects must pervade through all of space at an infinite velocity is
the
correct one. (The alternative idea, that alternate universes co-existing in
the
same space would seem to be a concept that is so absurd that it seems
reasonable
to wonder how much LSD its adherents absorbed during their college years.)

Quite significant is the fact that the original "big bang"
fireball from which our Universe is believed to have begun has been
observed. We
know its location and we know our velocity with respect to it. As a result
we
have actually observed our "absolute velocity" through space. Since this is
impossible under the "space-time" concept, we seem to be forced back to the
Lorentz Transformation - Aether Theory!

When one recognizes that information CAN propagate at a
velocity significantly greater that the velocity of light, the idea of a
"ABSOLUTE TIME" cannot be dismissed, just as the idea cannot be dismissed by
those who consider the virtually instantaneously travel between locations
using
"wormholes". A successful use of a "wormhole" in this manner would also
effectively establish "ABSOLUTE SIMULTANIETY". Unfortunately for the
intellectual status quo, "ABSOLUTE TIME" requires that the special case
solution
of Special Relativity represented by the Lorentz-Transformation Aether
Theory
represent our reality. The mathematical abstraction of space-time is just
that,
an abstraction which makes the computations of velocity effects easier, it
has
no physical significance. Nature doesn't actually give a damn about the
abstractions we use to make computations simpler, it does care, however,
about
the useful function that the classical Aether performs. (Dr. Einstein is
reported to have held on to the belief in absolute time, identical to a
belief
in the Aether theory, for 25 years after he published Special Relativity and
to
have warned "remember gentlemen, we have not proven that the Aether does not
exist, we have merely proven that we do not need it for computations.) We
have
reached a point where the existence of the Aether has been observationally
proven though the "paired photon" experiments. It is time for the
mathematical
idiot-savants to step aside and let intelligent men attack the problem
objectively without fear of repression.

Recently, astronomers in Australia announced that they have
observed that the velocity of light in the early stages of the Universe was
greater than it is now. At present, their observations are considered to be
errors since the velocity of light is "known" to be constant. WRONG! The
velocity of light is "a constant" only when measured with local units of
measurement. It cannot be both constant and "a constant" unless the Lorentz
Transformations for length and time are either equal or are unity. THEY
AREN'T,
they are reciprocal! In addition, cosmologists are struggling to make sense
of
the apparent speeding up of the expansion of the Universe at extreme
distances
from the original "fireball". It must be pointed out that both these
observations would result if the correct gravitational transformations were
employed, Force = 1 Length = 1/(1-$) Time = (1-$) instead of the erroneous
ones
which result from the naive error made in the original derivation of General
Relativity which was plastered over with the fakery of "curved space".
(There is
no transformation for length in General Relativity and the transformation
for
time provided by GR is (1/(1+$). $ represents the term used by General
Relativity for defining its "time dilation".

It is puzzling as to why there is a search for a mysterious
additional repulsive force to explain the observed rate of expansion of the
Universe. The reason that this is puzzling is the fact that nowhere in the
discussions has the writer found that the radiation pressure of the 3K
background, and a possibly much large pressure caused by neutrinos, has been
taken into account. Since it is currently estimated that the energy
represented
by that radiation is at least 10 times the energy present in the matter
contained in the Universe, it is easy to believe that the pressure produced
by
the radiation can easily produce the required espansive force. Is there
proof
that this is the case, probably not, but this source of expansive force has
not
been included in the calculations. With this viewpoint, the Universe would
be
analogous to a gas (radiation) filled balloon containing a sprinkling of
dust
(matter). (An article in the March 2003 issue of Scientific American
describes
the Universe as just such a dist filled gas-bag.)

If one examines the big bang observations one finds that they
are consistent with the Universe being formed within a gravitationally
collapsed
object when the correct gravitational transformations are employed. Such an
object, as observed internally without accounting for the relativistically
changed size of the units of measurement, would collapse and then, when that
collapse had proceeded to a radius equal to four times the horizon radius,
would
be observed to expand explosively at the beginning and then settle down to a
more moderate rate of expansion. In directions away from the observed source
of
the expansion, the rate of that expansion should also seem to be increasing
due
to the fact that we are also looking into the past. These effects are to be
expected from the application of the corrected gravitational transformations
to
the problem. The effects described are rigorously derived in "Gravity" at
http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm .

The source material for this posting may be found in
http://users.isp.com/retic/hoax.htm ("The Einstein Hoax" {1997});
http://users.isp.com/retic/gravity.htm; ("Gravity" {1987}); and
http://users.isp.com/retic/relcor.htm ("Corrections to Special Relativity"
{1997}). EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH
EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL
OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT
ALWAYS MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF
WORKMANSHIP FROM THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at
http://users.isp.com/retic/postinglog.htm.

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:- einsteinhoax@xxxxxxx

The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 5
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.


.