# sci.physics.particle

**Dimensional Analysis and Relativity**,*Retne***Equality of elemental charges.**,*avergon***Re: Equality of elemental charges.**,*FrediFizzx*

**"The Arrow of Time"**,*Retne***Borders Group Mind Control (Wenzlaff -- covert military)**,*Laura***"The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"**,*Evird***"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"**,*Evird***"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"**,*Evird***"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"**,*Evird***"The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"**,*Evird***"The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"**,*Evird***"Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"**,*Evird***"Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"**,*Nom***"Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"**,*Nom***Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"**,*Liam Roche*

**any microns film for traversal ion tracking - other than LR115 film**,*wang***"The Matter of "Dark Matter"**,*Nom***Lorentz Violation of the Standard Model**,*J.C. Yoon***Re: Lorentz Violation of the Standard Model**,*Chris Dams***Re: Lorentz Violation of the Standard Model**,*J.C. Yoon***Re: Lorentz Violation of the Standard Model**,*Chris Dams***Re: Lorentz Violation of the Standard Model**,*J.C. Yoon*

**heavy Particle decay**,*Andy***SFT vs QFT and GR**,*tony fleming***smallest measurable length scale implies cutoff, so why do we still believe string theory?**,*inquirydog***Re: smallest measurable length scale implies cutoff, so why do we still believe string theory?**,*Autymn D. C.***Re: smallest measurable length scale implies cutoff, so why do we still believe string theory?**,*inquirydog***Re: smallest measurable length scale implies cutoff, so why do we still believe string theory?**,*Autymn D. C.***Re: smallest measurable length scale implies cutoff, so why do we still believe string theory?**,*inquirydog***Re: smallest measurable length scale implies cutoff, so why do we still believe string theory?**,*Autymn D. C.***Re: smallest measurable length scale implies cutoff, so why do we still believe string theory?**,*inquirydog***Re: smallest measurable length scale implies cutoff, so why do we still believe string theory?**,*Autymn D. C.*

**Re: smallest measurable length scale implies cutoff, so why do we still believe string theory?**,*gileadx3*

**"Examining Mathematical Approaches"**,*Nom***"The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"**,*Woleb***"The Einstein Hoax"**,*Woleb***calorimeter question**,*Jeff K deJong***"The Right Angle Lever Paradox"**,*Woleb***Beams and time dependence**,*Zinc Potterman***"How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"**,*Woleb***"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"**,*Woleb***photon entanglement**,*ph42***Re: photon entanglement**,*Autymn D. C.*

**Re: Matter Energy and Time**,*Autymn D. C.***Re: Matter Energy and Time**,*Ron Poteet*

**"The Paradox of Zeno"**,*Woleb***A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"**,*Einsteinhoax***Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"**,*Autymn D. C.*

**"The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe"**,*Rapep***Re: Neutrino caused beta decay**,*David Jonsson***matter creation**,*Nick Summers***Re: matter creation**,*FrediFizzx***Re: matter creation**,*Autymn D. C.***Re: matter creation**,*Nick Summers***Re: matter creation**,*Autymn D. C.*

**"Corrections to Special Relativity"**,*Rapep*- <Possible follow-ups>
**"Corrections to Special Relativity"**,*Nom*

**Questions part II again**,*wschlanger***Questions part III**,*wschlanger***Questions part II**,*wschlanger***Questions part II -- Deep questions on negative mass**,*wschlanger***Re: Questions part II -- Deep questions on negative mass**,*Autymn D. C.***Re: Questions part II -- Deep questions on negative mass**,*Autymn D. C.*

**Questions Part I**,*wschlanger***Re: Questions Part I**,*Autymn D. C.***Re: Questions Part I**,*Autymn D. C.*

**"Retic Postings and SPAM"**,*Serif*- <Possible follow-ups>
**"Retic Postings and SPAM"**,*Serif*

**Ne vous laissez pas raconter n'importe quoi :**,*jean . teremetz***Wave neighborhood=particle**,*darthpup***"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"**,*Serif***"A Snapshot of a Photon"**,*Serif***Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"**,*Autymn D. C.***Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"**,*Y.Porat***Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"**,*Autymn D. C.*

**"Gravity"**,*Serif*- <Possible follow-ups>
**"Gravity"**,*Nom*

**one or many particles?**,*Cyberkatru***"The Source of Gravitational Energy"**,*Skrow*- <Possible follow-ups>
**"The Source of Gravitational Energy"**,*Skrow*

**The electron is not a point particle.**,*Henry J Cobb***Re: The electron is not a point particle.**,*Y.Porat***Re: The electron is not a point particle.**,*Autymn D. C.*

**Re: The electron is not a point particle.**,*Josef Matz***Re: The electron is not a point particle.**,*Y.Porat***Re: The electron is not a point particle.**,*Josef Matz***Re: The electron is not a point particle.**,*Y.Porat*