Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- From: "Y.Porat" <maporat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Jan 2006 22:02:18 -0800
Josef Matz wrote:
> "Henry J Cobb" <hcobb@xxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:qKGdnR_rc7vS5yrenZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@xxxxxxxxx
> > If the transfer of a single quantum took even a tiny amount of time then
> > you would be able to use relativity to stretch this out over a period of
> > time and observe or interrupt the transfer of energy in sub quantum units.
> >
> > Therefore any quantum transfer has to occur in zero time.
> >
> > And the speed of light limitation means that a zero time event occurs in
> > zero length. I.e., a mathematical point in space time.
> >
> > The wavelength of a microwave photon is huge when compared to the size
> > of a water molecule that emits or absorbs it, but this molecule is
> > infinitely huge when compared to the zero length quantum transfer of the
> > photon's energy.
> >
> > So even though the photon is about the size of its wavelength, it
> > impacts at a single point, because it is a single quantum particle.
> >
> > The electron is also a single quantum particle. The wave function
> > defines exactly the nature of the electron, but we can't ever measure
> > the wave function directly because any probe we use will impact at a
> > single random point of the electron's wave function and scatter the
> > electron's single quantum.
> >
> > So the electron is the size of its wave function, but it impacts at
> > random zero length points within this "wave packet".
> >
> > -HJC
>
> No, it impacts as a whole with a typical radius, the classic electron
> radius. See stray experiments.
a wave function is just a mathematical model of the electron
now too many people do not understand that having the partial success
of
predictions according that model does not put them in th eposition of
knowing
everything about the electron!!
iow it is just a *partial model*
that partial model (together with the pompous illusion that they know
now everything
about it
was resulting the false mathematical ) conclusion that:
'the electron is a 'point particle'
i was in a time where all the 'experts' preached undoubtedly and
abusing anyone
who dared to say that the electron cannot be a 'point particle'
it was alike people like me and others who indicated that
'a point particle for the electron is physics nonsense!!
one of my new breakthrough arguments against it was :
' a point particle cannot annihilate itself''!!
a point is the smallest possible entity
so the smallest cannot become something smaller!!
just simple commonsense that took too long to understand by
'intelligent people'
to understand.
and BTW the photon' is as well not a 'point particle'
it is a conglomeration of some smaller physical entities (unknown yet
but the above physics sense tels it obviously!!)
ATB
Y.Porat
---------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- From: Josef Matz
- Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- References:
- The electron is not a point particle.
- From: Henry J Cobb
- Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- From: Josef Matz
- The electron is not a point particle.
- Prev by Date: one or many particles?
- Next by Date: Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- Previous by thread: Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- Next by thread: Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|