Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- From: "Josef Matz" <josefmatz@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:29:00 +0100
"Y.Porat" <maporat@xxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1136181738.584088.165000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Josef Matz wrote:
> > "Henry J Cobb" <hcobb@xxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> > news:qKGdnR_rc7vS5yrenZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@xxxxxxxxx
> > > If the transfer of a single quantum took even a tiny amount of time
then
> > > you would be able to use relativity to stretch this out over a period
of
> > > time and observe or interrupt the transfer of energy in sub quantum
units.
> > >
> > > Therefore any quantum transfer has to occur in zero time.
> > >
> > > And the speed of light limitation means that a zero time event occurs
in
> > > zero length. I.e., a mathematical point in space time.
> > >
> > > The wavelength of a microwave photon is huge when compared to the size
> > > of a water molecule that emits or absorbs it, but this molecule is
> > > infinitely huge when compared to the zero length quantum transfer of
the
> > > photon's energy.
> > >
> > > So even though the photon is about the size of its wavelength, it
> > > impacts at a single point, because it is a single quantum particle.
> > >
> > > The electron is also a single quantum particle. The wave function
> > > defines exactly the nature of the electron, but we can't ever measure
> > > the wave function directly because any probe we use will impact at a
> > > single random point of the electron's wave function and scatter the
> > > electron's single quantum.
> > >
> > > So the electron is the size of its wave function, but it impacts at
> > > random zero length points within this "wave packet".
> > >
> > > -HJC
> >
> > No, it impacts as a whole with a typical radius, the classic electron
> > radius. See stray experiments.
>
> a wave function is just a mathematical model of the electron
>
> now too many people do not understand that having the partial success
> of
> predictions according that model does not put them in th eposition of
> knowing
> everything about the electron!!
>
> iow it is just a *partial model*
> that partial model (together with the pompous illusion that they know
> now everything
> about it
> was resulting the false mathematical ) conclusion that:
>
> 'the electron is a 'point particle'
> i was in a time where all the 'experts' preached undoubtedly and
> abusing anyone
> who dared to say that the electron cannot be a 'point particle'
> it was alike people like me and others who indicated that
> 'a point particle for the electron is physics nonsense!!
>
> one of my new breakthrough arguments against it was :
>
> ' a point particle cannot annihilate itself''!!
Why do you think that only points can have this property.
> a point is the smallest possible entity
ok. Nothing smaller than the point. Thats right.
> so the smallest cannot become something smaller!!
if it are points.
>
> just simple commonsense that took too long to understand by
> 'intelligent people'
> to understand.
> and BTW the photon' is as well not a 'point particle'
the photon might be one, very likely.
> it is a conglomeration of some smaller physical entities (unknown yet
> but the above physics sense tels it obviously!!)
>
> ATB
> Y.Porat
> ---------------------
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- References:
- The electron is not a point particle.
- From: Henry J Cobb
- Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- From: Josef Matz
- Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- From: Y.Porat
- The electron is not a point particle.
- Prev by Date: Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- Next by Date: "Gravity"
- Previous by thread: Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- Next by thread: Re: The electron is not a point particle.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
