Questions part II
- From: wschlanger@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 5 Jan 2006 19:03:41 -0800
Regarding the mass of electrons, I have a rather deep question. As I
understand it, electrons that are more massive (muons) bind closer to
the proton because the bohr radius depends on mass. Now if a collision
were ULTRA-ULTRA energetic, is it possible the resulting ultra-heavy
electron could be so close to the proton that the electric binding
energy, which is negative, could exceed the atom's total rest energy?
This would mean hydrogen atoms with ultra-heavy electrons might
actually weigh less at a certain point than atoms with lighter
electrons.
Who is to say then that the electrons, when "in an atom" actually
retain their full weight? Maybe they weigh less because of the negative
electrical binding energy and, at a certain cretical mass, maybe the
electron's mass reaches zero? That is, the electrical binding energy
when the rest energy reaches a certain point, might be so negative
that, when you add the rest energy you actually get zero.
So I have a dispute about what actually happens when an electron and a
positron annihilate. I have determined that the rest energy is always 2
M_e C^2. Now electric binding energy is NEGATIVE and becomes MORE AND
MORE NEGATIVE as the electron and positron get closer and clsoer
together.
Most people believe the particles race towards eachother but never
reach the speed of light until a discrete step where they suddenly
ANNIHILATE.
I do not believe there is any such thing as SUDDEN! I am a firm
believer in Gravity as more fundamental than QED. So I believe the
annihilation is GRADUAL.
If I am right, then we can see that as the particles accelerate toward
eachother, the TOTAL ENERGY actually is decreasing since the rest
energy is added by the binding energy which approaches negative
infinity.
Normally we say, an electron can't accelerate to the speed of light and
furthermore we say, acceleration produces radiation. But in this case
it happens so fast something magical happens. The electron actually CAN
reach the speed of light if you treat it as a wave with decreasing
mass! IF you define "mass" as rest energy + binding energy (or is it
1/2?), then mass DECREASES relative to our time prespective.
Certainly relative to the particles, the annihilation takes finite
time. This is supposed to be impossible since as you reach the speed of
light, mass is supposed to increase. The fact that light-speed can
actually be reached (at which point 1 dimension of space is actually
lost and rest energy too) is because NEGATIVE ENERGY IS AT WORK HERE.
What is happening is as the particles approach, BINDING ENERGY WHICH IS
NEGATIVE INCREASES thus counteracting the otherwise ever-increasing
kinetic energy.
At a critical point, the rest energy is OVERWHELMED by (negative)
BINDING ENERGY. At this point light speed is actually REACHED and
according to QED this is an EVENT -- from a wave perspective the rest
energy has dropped from a discrete positive value to zero. A 3-D space
distribution becomes only 2-D.
The remaining kinetic energy appears as photon energy.
If this is possible, perhaps it is reversable -- light waves can
produce electron matter waves. If the light is squeezed matter, can
"squeezed electrons" then be produced? Can standing waves be produced
so the energy oscillates, sometimes being negative?
Perhaps the key to talking to other worlds is negative matter. My
theory was that maybe I CAN produce a negative mass GOLD atom and a
positive mass GOLD atom. Maybe the negative mass gold atom must however
COMBINE with a positive mass gold atom in a parallel universe.
Now how does this new theory affect TIME? Time is supposed to SLOW DOWN
as you speed up but not if negative energy is at work! What is the true
nature of time? Perhaps reassesing the annihilation of an electron and
positron would reveal some suprises.
.
- Prev by Date: Questions part II -- Deep questions on negative mass
- Next by Date: Questions part III
- Previous by thread: Questions part II -- Deep questions on negative mass
- Next by thread: Questions part III
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
