Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"




"Evird" <evird@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:84bbc$43db8def$d8080e76$10971@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"

What is overlooked is the fact that when we observe extreme distances
such as exist when we look at the source of the "big bang" or in a
direction opposite to that source we are looking backwards in time.

There is no direction opposite to the source of the big bang. All directions
point towards the big bang, and the cosmic microwave radiation background
(CMBR) we see in every direction is a relic of an early era when the
universe was tiny compared to now. Picture the big bang as a very small
sphere which gets inflated to a huge size, and us on the surface of the
sphere. Which way is the little sphere now?

Also, believe me, no-one with a smattering of knowledge ignores the fact
that we see a past era when looking at a large distance. This is a very well
known.

The description of the "Big bang" tells us that the Universe suddenly
appeared at a point in space which then underwent an almost instantaneous
"inflationary expansion" which then settled down to the more sedate
expansion we presently observe. In other words, at the beginning the rate
of expansion was apparently much larger than it is now. The same effect is
to be expected when we look outward to extreme distances. We are making
observations of events which occurred very early in the history of the
Universe. If, at that time, the Universe was apparently expanding in an
"inflationary" manner, it must also apparently expand in an inflationary
manner at extreme distances.

This sounds logical, but if you look at any material about inflation you
will see it only too place over a very short period of time near the start
of the universe ( about 10^-32 seconds - a tiny fraction of a second). This
epoch is completely obscured from us by the CMBR which is the oldest thing
we can "see", arising from about 400,000 years after the big bang, when the
whole universe was ionised and cooled down to around 3000K. The astronomical
object nearest to the big bang that we have seen is a quasar at about
800,000,000 years from the big bang
http://www.sdss.org/news/releases/20030109.quasar.html


What we should see is that the rate of the universe's expansion increases
at extreme distances, and this is what is being observed! The only mystery
is what is causing the inflation.

When one correctly derives General Relativity the source of the
apparent "inflationary" expansion becomes readily apparent. The
strangeness occurs as a result of Dr. Einstein's incredibly naive error in
the derivation. Correctly derived, General Relativity provides meets all
of the observational tests which are alleged to have verified (valid only
in weak fields such as exist in the Solar system. The corrected
gravitational theory account for:

A:- The observed gravitational force in terms of three dimensional
Euclidean Space (observationally verified).

B:- It is consistent with the ABSOLUTE validity of the Law of Conservation
of Energy.

C:- It eliminates the idea of "Black Holes" since gravitational pressure
and radiation pressure at extreme densities (twice the ABSOLUTE "Event
Horizon" radius or less) gravitational pressure and radiation pressure
balance each other and gravitational collapse ceases. (See:-
http://einsteinhoax/gravity.htm)

D:- The apparent "inflationary expansion" at extreme distances results
from the fact that the ABSOLUTE velocity of light was much higher in the
past.

The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm ("The Einstein Hoax" {1997});
http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm; ("Gravity" {1987}); and
http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm ("Corrections to Special Relativity"
{1997}). EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH
EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL
OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO
NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER
STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same
courtesy as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of
our parts, please do not raise objections that are not related to material
that you have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:- einsteinhoax@xxxxxxx

The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 5
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.



.