Re: "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"




"Do Do" <avergon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1139678957.395878.232770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To answer your question, first conside the following:


The true particles of the universe are electrons, protons and their
combination, neutrons. Everything else
Is transitory and soon decays into one or the other of the true
particles. Free neutrons do just that.

So you've undiscovered the three neutrinos? Looks like a big step backwards
to me, but what do I know. <shrug>

It stands to reason all particles consist of a wave structure - they
all have frequencies. When you smash them together the resonant
(permanent) structure is disrupted and immediately degenerates (decays)
to the next lower
stable level. So what's the value?

You ask about the increase in energy (mass). Simple. Protons, for
example, are accelerated by bombarding them with radiation. That
radiation has mass. The radiation/particle collision is an inelastic
one - and the mass becomes incorporated into the proton so as it goes
faster it also gains in mass (energy). If the particle is stopped or
changes course it sheds some or all of the excess mass as radiation
(bremstrahlung).

That's amazing. So you mean while all those guys at CERN and Fermilab have
been inferring the laws of nature from their experiments, you can get better
results just by taking some crockery and throwing it at the wall? Newton and
his apple had nothing on you.

As Einstein said:

"You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his
tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. Do you understand
this? And radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they
receive them there. The only difference is that there is no cat."

thereby completely explaining the theory of electromagnetism without using
any complicated mathematics.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Do you believe in black holes?
    ... radiation carry no information. ... And how is it any different if the mass is located in the "Coal ... but is that via 'FTL' virtual particles ... If 2M is the event horizon, 3M is the photon sphere, ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... >>Show me a case where Newton's law does not apply to a mass. ... the precession of Mercury has nothing to do with gravity. ... >>The kinematics of the interactions between elementary particles. ... >>I have done experiments with fast protons interacting elastically with ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... >>Show me a case where Newton's law does not apply to a mass. ... the precession of Mercury has nothing to do with gravity. ... >>The kinematics of the interactions between elementary particles. ... >>I have done experiments with fast protons interacting elastically with ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... >>Show me a case where Newton's law does not apply to a mass. ... the precession of Mercury has nothing to do with gravity. ... >>The kinematics of the interactions between elementary particles. ... >>I have done experiments with fast protons interacting elastically with ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... > Show me a case where Newton's law does not apply to a mass. ... > The kinematics of the interactions between elementary particles. ... > I have done experiments with fast protons interacting elastically with ...
    (sci.physics)