Re: Measuring mass experimentally


Golden Boar wrote:
PD wrote:
Golden Boar wrote:
PD wrote:
Golden Boar wrote:
PD wrote:
Golden Boar wrote:
What methods are used experimentally measure the mass of an object?

That depends on whether the object is macroscopic and long-lived, or
microscopic and short-lived, or following some other description. What
did you have in mind?

PD

I meant microscopic and short lived.

Excellent question.
If it is short-lived, that means that it decays into products. The
products are things that we can measure, including their energy and
momentum. (How we do that is whole other question.)
What we know is that the invariant mass of the decaying particle is the
same as the invariant mass of the system of final products. The
invariant mass of the system of final products is m = sqrt (E^2 - p^2),
where E is the (scalar) sum of the energies of all the final products,
and p is the (magnitude of the vector) sum of the momenta of all the
final products. In principle, if we do this just once -- for even one
decay -- then we've found the mass of the particle.
In practice, however, sometimes these final products do not come from
the decay of the short-lived particle. Sometimes they come from other
processes which happen to mimic the same products from the decay of the
particle. This is called background. If you do the same calculation for
a background event, you will get a completely different mass than what
you'd see from a short-lived particle decay.
But if you look at a bunch of these kinds of events, all with the
distinguishing final products, and you do the same calculation for each
of these events, and plot the distribution of those calculated masses,
you'll see a sharp hump on top of a flat background distribution. An
example is shown here: http://history.fnal.gov/jyoh_docs/jpg/604.jpg
This sharp hump is the signal of the decay of the short-lived particle,
and the central mass of that hump is the mass of the particle. In fact,
you learn something from the *width* of that distribution, because the
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle tells you that the shorter the life of
that particle, the wider that mass distribution will be -- so that
measuring the width actually gives you a measurement of the lifetime of
the particle.

PD

If I remember correctly, most things will eventually decay into
electrons, neutrinos and photons, so how do we measure the mass of
electrons?

The Bainbridge apparatus (essentially a spectrometer) measured the
charge-to-mass ratio for electrons. The charge of electrons was
measured by Millikan. This enabled us to measure the mass of electrons
a long, long time ago.

PD

Could Compton scattering be used to measure the mass of the electron?

I suppose, though I'm unaware of an experiment that was designed to
improve the accuracy on the electron mass measurement using Compton
scattering. Best measurements now use a Penning trap, and I doubt that
Compton scattering would be competitive with that method.

PD

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
    ... | decay is a random event. ... still about a million more electrons than that. ... James is responding before reading ... | as a result of a cosmic ray particle (typically ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Testing the SR Concept of Mutual Time Dilation
    ... Or, to be more precise, the m/e (mass to charge ... Surplus or deficit of electrons on a 1 gm mass is much less effect, ... if it were a massless particle], many of the calculations done every ... I always know I've made my point when you deflect ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Testing the SR Concept of Mutual Time Dilation
    ... Or, to be more precise, the m/e (mass to charge ... We do assume that placing a charge on a 1 gm weight will not effect ... Surplus or deficit of electrons on a 1 gm mass is much less effect, ... A neutral particle beam would not be deflected by a magnetic field, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Measuring mass experimentally
    ... What we know is that the invariant mass of the decaying particle is the ... decay -- then we've found the mass of the particle. ... you'll see a sharp hump on top of a flat background distribution. ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Kaons decay into w-boson then gluon VALIDATES MY THEORY!!!
    ... ENERGYWITH THE NUCLEONS ENDS UP AS THE SUBSTANTIAL MASS OF THE ... gluon (from kaon decay) ... - The mass of a two particle system or a three particle system is not ... GeV or 91 GeV. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)