Re: A Revised Planck Scale?

FrediFizzx wrote:

Hi Rob,

I do think that hadrons as black holes of any kind has been rule out
already. No? However, the confinement mechanism may be similar to a
black hole's event horizon concept. I don't know what your G ~= 2.2E31
cgs means? Cgs is centimeter, gram, second? I suppose this is some
kind of relative strength of gravity? Relative to what? I will try to
take a look at your website in more detail when I get more time. But I
would expect that G disappears (goes to zero) into a unification at
small scales with the other forces. We have a hexagonal fractal lattice
structure for the quantum "vacuum" that you can check out at the links
below.



Hi Fred,

Kerr-Newman (i.e., charged) black holes share the following properties
with hadrons like the proton:

1. Almost completely characterized in terms of mass, charge and spin

2. Gyromagnetic ratios = 2

3. Magnetic moments, but no electric dipole moments

4. Similar mass/spin relationships

5. Cross-sections that increase in collisions

Regarding the conventional Newtonian gravitational constant G (= 6.67 x
10^-8 cgs) and the Discrete Fractal paradigm's (
www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw ) predicted G(n-1) of about 2.2 x 10^31
cgs, consider the following.

General Relativity says Rvab -1/2 gvab R = k Tvab, or in words the
distribution of mass/energy determines the curvature of spacetime and
the curvature of spacetime determines how the mass/energy (i.e.,
matter) moves.

Einstein found that k = 8 pi/c^4 G worked for the macrocosm tests that
were available.
The Discrete Fractal paradigm proposes that this works for the Stellar
Scale of nature's infinite hierarchy, but that the gravitational
coupling constant is different for each Scale.
Bottom line k' = 8 pi/c^4 [A^1-D]^n G , where A = 5.2 x 10^17, D =
3.174 and n = {...-2,-1,0,1,2,...} .

So Rvab - 1/2 gvab R = 8 pi/c^4 [A^1-D]^n G Tvab ,

and gravitational interactions would be roughly equal to
electromagnetic interactions in terms of strength and importance within
Atomic Scale systems.

That's the basic argument, and details (both non-technical and
technical) can be found at the website.

Thanks for your interest and comments,
Rob

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Neutrino Mass and Supernovae
    ... >>generally used explanation for why gravity will slow time and or light. ... Now ask yourself what might happen for two black holes in free ... >>will not become trapped in their own time dilating effects in such a way ... If it can be argued that the violation can always be hidden ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: More evidence of negative curvature
    ... > I know that we see enormous amounts of matter being ejected from black ... > or what we call black holes, at the center of the galaxies in jets. ... How is a black hole making matter? ... > gravity, then there can be no overall expansion. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Neutrino Mass and Supernovae
    ... generally used explanation for why gravity will slow time and or light. ... Now ask yourself what might happen for two black holes in free ... will not become trapped in their own time dilating effects in such a way ... If it can be argued that the violation can always be hidden ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: .Simple SR question...
    ... Well I'm sure you know what is meant by 'Flat Gravity'. ... "Studying neutron stars and black holes ... Originally you used the phrase "flat gravity" when you meant ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: More evidence of negative curvature
    ... I know that we see enormous amounts of matter being ejected from black ... if observed expansion is effectively neutralized by ... gravity, then there can be no overall expansion. ... Black holes are the other side of the cycle; ...
    (sci.physics)