Re: Size of the Electron

FrediFizzx wrote:
My "gibberish" is supported by the Higgs field concept.

Your gibberish doesn't know the meanings of words or causes.
Fields/charges are not there always; they must qualify to be there.

Your gibberish has no support at all.

I'v no gibberish. My reckish is supported by Coulomb's relations.

-Aut

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Henin: her all-time rank
    ... you reveal your dumbness by flattering yourself that you have ... worth spending more than 5 dismissive seconds on. ... dude, since 'robin' posted gibberish, how can one respond intelligently? ... does not qualify it as 'gibberish'. ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: Henin: her all-time rank
    ... you reveal your dumbness by flattering yourself that you have ... worth spending more than 5 dismissive seconds on. ... dude, since 'robin' posted gibberish, how can one respond intelligently? ... does not qualify it as 'gibberish'. ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: Size of the Electron
    ... You gibberish doesn't know the meanings of words or causes. ... Fields/charges are not there always; they must qualify to be there. ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: 35 today
    ... I've started using spellcheck, I just need gibberish check. ... you'd qualify from your CL group and meet me for a ... Sort it out. ...
    (uk.sport.football)
  • Re: THE LARGEST PRIME NUMBER.
    ... content to qualify even as gibberish. ... It was just "word salad"; ...
    (sci.math)