Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
- From: tommiya <tom_miya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 15:03:22 -0000
On 7 3 , 7:48, "Sreb" <s...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
No objective reason seems to have been presented to preclude the likelihood
that Nature operates through multiple independent mechanisms which may or
may not interact with each other to produce more complex phenomena.
There are many theories to unify every mechanism.
They say that there are 10 dimensions in the world.
Or somebody say that there are 5, 11, 26 dimensions in the world.
I noticed that there are empirical relations using by adding number (4
x (4 - N + 1) / N).
5 = 4 + 1 = 4 + 4 x ( 4 - 4 +1) / 4
10 = 4 + 6 = 4+ 4 x (4 - 2 +1) / 2
11 = 4 + 1 + 6 = 4 + 4 x ( 4 - 4 +1) / 4 +4 x (4 - 2 +1) / 2
26 = 4 + 6 + 16= 4 + 4 x (4 - 2 +1) / 2+ 4 x (4 - 1 +1) / 1
N is related with the number of symmetry.
N=4 space, N=2 electron, N=1 neutrino
Maybe N =3 is quark. 4 x (4 - N +1) / N= 8 / 3
Quark is related with 8.
So explainig electrons and space, there needs 11 dimensions.
Explainig electrons and neutrino, there needs 26 dimensions.
NOT UNIFIED THEORY, BUT CLASSIFIED THEORY.
OK?
.
- References:
- "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
- From: Sreb
- "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
- Prev by Date: "Quantum Theory vs General Relativity"
- Next by Date: Re: Bell's theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
- Next by thread: Empirical Calculation of Elementary Particle
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
