Re: Elements heavier than Fe; supernovae and particle accelerators



On Sep 13, 4:18 pm, icannotfor...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I hope someone can answer this simple question for me, a layman:

If a star can only produce elements up to the periodic number of Fe,
and those heavier than Fe are produced in supernovae, how can WE
produce even HEAVIER elements in particle accelerators? It would seem
that the energy required must be equal to a supernova.

It's not hard if the atoms don't even add up to a kilogram, or gram,
or even a nanogram. Accelerators' beams regularly get hotter than a
supernova, at 10 GK. The binding energy between iron and uranium
atoms is 182*1.5 MeV, which is not very much--1.5 MeV is 11.6 GK at
the most.

-Aut

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: i dont like irrationals
    ... It is the only place in this universum where heavier ... >>atoms are made of from less heavier. ... > supernova) shining briefly. ... low-mass stars like the sun only get up through ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: i dont like irrationals
    ... It is the only place in this universum where heavier ... less common in our star. ... supernova) shining briefly. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: i dont like irrationals
    ... Stan Brown writes: ... >>in supernova. ... It is the only place in this universum where heavier ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Does a battery or a clock lose mass...
    ... exactly has got heavier? ... The sum total of the atoms in the spring now have a mass sligthly higher than the same number of atoms would have individually. ... Similarily, if you let one Oxygen atom react with two Hydrogen-atoms and produce a single watermolecule, then the watermolecule will end up having sligthly lower mass than 2*H-mass plus 1*O-mass, the difference being precisely equal to the energy released in the reaction. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)