Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.

On Nov 7, 1:49 pm, "LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx" <LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 6, 3:02 pm, "LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx" <LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Nov 6, 2:30 pm, "LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx" <LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Oct 30, 9:16 pm, "LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx" <LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Oct 16, 8:14 pm, "LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx" <LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Oct 11, 7:22 pm, "LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx" <LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.

If we accept that the nature of non-locality is described as an
instantaneous exchange of "eigenstate" information and in addition can
have different levels of action, THEN I postulate that the quantum
mechanical universe is able to MIMIC relativity rules down to only a
few anomalies, which should be measurable by experiment. The different
levels of EPR action should be present between evaporated silver atoms
inside a Stern Gerlach experiment, or inside a classic EPR experiment,
or even at very long distance between ( anti)copy universes. See:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
The consequence of this new model is, that the lightspeed in a complex
way is related to the mass and gravity field of massive objects like
the Earth.As a result, there is a relative simple possibility to check
the ether DRAG at a mountain summit, by the diurnal distance variation
measurements of single GPS satellite signals by a "single GPS-
receiver".
If the lightspeed around the Earth is dragged by gravity, then light
rays that are "skimming the Earth" are supposed to be less influenced
by the motion of the Earth. Thus GPS signals that are skimming the
Earth surface are also less influenced and will show at least diurnal
variation related to the orbital motion of the earth.
There is perhaps even a chance to find "some" universal variation, as
is measured by Dayton Miller .

See my proposal with sketch at:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-...

Small lightspeed anomalies, are already measured at mountain summits
in parallel direction with the Earth's orbital motion around the Sun
by Dayton Miller ( 1925-1928) and Yuri Galaev (Ukrain) , however due
to the very small variations, these results are still ignored by the
mainstream.A second interesting way to measure the ether speed was
performed by Y Galaev in 2002:THE MEASURING OF ETHER-DRIFT VELOCITY
AND KINEMATIC ETHER ISCOSITY WITHIN OPTICAL WAVES BANDPublished:
Spacetime and Substance, Vol.3, No.5 (15), 2002, P.207-224. Author: -
Yuri Galaev, Ph.D.; Senior research officer of the Institute for
Radiophysics & Electronics National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,
and corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences
(RANS). see:http://narod.yandex.ru/100.xhtml?www.spacetime.narod.ru/
0015-pdf.zip
LeoVuyk

My open letter dated 16 october 2007 to professor Langley.

Dear professor Langley,

I am aware of your magnificent work on high precision GPS Point
positioning models.
In my own -fully different- QM vacuum research, I came to surprising
conclusions about the origin of strong outliers in GPS signals which
are supported by your TOPEX-POSEIDON and CHAMP pseudorange residuals
up to 5 meters, which I found inside articles mentioned below
I came to the (anti-relativistic) conclusion, that the Earth's orbital
speed, ca. 30 km/sec, should be incorporated in the GPS signal speed.
The effect should be a GPS-LEO pseudorange residual decrease of max 3
meters.
My vacuum model predict that; If GPS signals are not directly pointing
into the surface of the massive gravitating Earth then the orbital
speed of the Earth should be accounted for.

Thus for ground based receivers this is mostly not the case.
On Earth, this effect should be measurable only on mountain summits or
high riser buildings. (see attachment) and also on internet:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-...
and perhaps:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

ps. This is an open letter also visible on other locations.

I hope you like it.

LeoVuyk.

Your articles which I see As a support of the vacuum effect mentioned
above:
Evaluation of High-Precision, Single-Frequency GPS Point Positioning
Models (2001)http://gauss.gge.unb.ca/papers.pdf/iongnss2004.beran.pdf
GPS Phase-Connected, Precise Point Positioning
of Low Earth Orbiters (2004)http://gauss.gge.unb.ca/papers.pdf/gnss01.bisnath.pdf

by Tomas Beran, Sunil B. Bisnath and Richard B. Langley
University of New Brunswick Ca.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

There seems to be two different shaped LASOF ( local anti-symmetrical
oscillating vacuum frame) lightspeed extinction envelopes, for A:
Earth bound light sources and for B: Satellite- or space based light
sources.
Based on Radar reflection data of Venus and Mercury done by I.I
Shapiro, I concluded, that for Earth bound light sources, the LASOF
extinction envelope around the Earth, seems to be globular with a
diameter of 70 million km. see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/02/gravity-dependent-li...

Based on sparse Formosat- Champ- Topex satellite data in combination
with the small anomalies measured by D.Miller ( 1926) and Y.Galaev, I
suggest, that for space based light sources, the LASOF envelope seems
to be ellipsoidal (or cigar shaped), with the major axis coinciding to
the Earth-Satellite axis of the same length ( 70 MILLION KM) and an
unknown minor axis.
Future satellite-GPS distance reading variations should give
information about the minor axis of the cigar shaped LASOF envelope.http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-...

LeoVuyk- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

For more clarity, I added a new image (C2) representing the geometry
of the Venus-Earth situation on 10th of April 1964. see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/02/gravity-dependent-li...quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

For more clarity, I added a new image (C2) representing the geometry
of the Venus-Earth situation on 10th of April 1964. see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/02/gravity-dependent-
lightspeed.html- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Short Period Quasi-Regular Oscillations" of Venus and Mercury of
about 30 days, are described by I.I Shapiro in Radar Astronomy 1968,
page 170-172. see at the end of the file mentioned below.
Examples of QPOs (Quasi Periodic Oscillations) or Orbital
Periodicities of Binaries are supposed to be examples of gravity
influenced LASOF lightspeed anomalies just like Venus and Mercury. see
below articles by: H.Lehmann, (Binary RZ-cas.) and P.G.Ostrov,
(Binary HV 2543).http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

To get more clarity about the key arguments I am using for my LASOF
idea, I searched and found new impressive data.
It is a clear example that GPS signals skimming the earth passing near
or at Higher altitudes, are less related to the earth frame and more
by the Solar frame.
In this case (CHAMP) providing outliers of 200 meters.
A clear example of GPS signal failures for the CHAMP Low Earth
Orbiters at 430 km altitude, is one of the reasons that so called
Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination (POD) by GPS readings is not
possible. Several other ground based systems and complex computer
programs are needed to compensate these errors.
However, if the LASOF idea about gravity (or Mass) related lightspeed
is incorporated in the GPS readings, then these errors are supposed to
vanish for a great deal.
I made a copy with my comment see:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-could-influence.html

The information described above was found in "Near real time Precise
orbit determination of low earth satellites etc. pdf page 85, by:Tae-
Suk-Bae 2006. Ohio state university. See:
http://www.ceegs.ohio-state.edu/gsreports/reports/report_481.pdf

Leo Vuyk.

.

Relevant Pages