Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?

Stupid for mankind is that we use fossile energies like oil, gas and coal
for heating houses, driving cars and and...
This changes the composite of the atmosphere sice 1870.

There still is a lot in the ground - enough for a couple of years. But we
have the techniques not do that.
But we still do and now beginning to think about if we could change this.

More is not necessary to say. What we do - more and more by Chinese and
Indish too now - is crazy, lazy
and idiotic.

Estimates that north pole is ice free in 15 years. I dont think the solar
constant has changed so much the last 140 years or ?

Josef

"Cino" <cino@xxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:a67ef$476a7d28$d80807ae$32690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Is Global Warming Caused By Man?

There has been an enormous publicity effort in the recent years to
get
the public to accept the idea that the release of greenhouse gases, mainly
CO2, has resulted in an inexorable rise in the surface temperature of the
Earth. A pair of graphs on page 6 of "An Inconvenient Book", by Glenn
Beck,
shows that premise to be completely false. (I am currently attempting to
determine the source and validity of the data.) These graphs cover a
period
of time between 1870 and 2000. As anyone with more than a double digit IQ
can plainly see, if this data is valid, then what we assert to be global
warming is due to Solar activity and not to man's activities. Furthermore,
the correlation is so obvious that a reasonable man would assert that the
Global Warming scare does not represent truth but is propaganda for some
ulterior motive. No scientist could be stupid enough not to recognize the
implications of these curves and have survived the PhD process.

The first pair of curves shows artic temperatures over the 130 year
period and the solar activity. The correlation between the curves is
almost
perfect, indicating an extremely strong cause and effect relationship! The
second pair of curves shows the CO2 content of the atmosphere and the
arctic
temperature over the same time period. The correlation between these
curves
is virtually non-existent. Providing I am able to verify the data
represented by these curves, it is reasonable to assert that Al Gore et al
are not merely mistaken, they are deliberately lying.

In all of the discussions of global warming, it has not been possible
to find any description of the actual mechanism by which CO2 etc. affect
the
surface temperature of the Earth. All of the discussions seem to assume
that
it is the amount of greenhouse gasses in the volume of the atmosphere
which
control the Earth's surface temperature. That assumption is false! Earth's
temperature is determined by the altitude amd temperature of the "CO2
horizon". It is at this altitude and below the greenhouse gases cause the
atmosphere to be opaque to the 10 to 14.5 micron band of electromagnetic
radiation. It is the greenhouse gases at this altitude that radiate the
Earth's energy input (internal and solar) to space. No greenhouse
radiation
to space occurs since below this altitude (about 55,000 feet) since any
such
radiation is re-absorbed by the gasses above. The equilibrium temperature
for re-radiation of Earth's energy input to space is about -55C. (Depends
upon Solar input, ice cover and internal heat). Heat transfer from lower
levels to the CO2 horizon is primarily by convection. From the altitude of
the CO2 horizon downward, the atmospheres absolute temperature rises due
to
adiabatic compression in proportion to the pressure ratio raised to the
1.35
power (see any thermodynamics text). It is this adiabatic temperature rise
which determined the surface temperature. It is This adiabatic temperature
rise effect from CO2 horizon is atop a very thick atmosphere which causes
the surface of Venus to be so hot. It is not the amount of greenhouse
contained in the bulk of the atmosphere.

All of the information needed to determine the global warming effects
of greenhouse gasses can be obtained by directly measuring the altitude at
which the atmosphere becomes opaque in the 10 to 14.5 micron band of
electromagnetic radiation. Its a simple observation readily made by
satellite. With this data, the Earth's average equilibrium surface
temperature is readily determined. The effort does not require a battalion
of PhDs,

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored
on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same
courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our
parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:- einsteinhoax@xxxxxxxx If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.






.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
    ... the public to accept the idea that the release of greenhouse gases, ... CO2, has resulted in an inexorable rise in the surface temperature of the ... second pair of curves shows the CO2 content of the atmosphere and the arctic ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
    ... This changes the composite of the atmosphere sice 1870. ... CO2, has resulted in an inexorable rise in the surface temperature of the ... The first pair of curves shows artic temperatures over the 130 year ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
    ... There has been an enormous publicity effort in the recent years to get the public to accept the idea that the release of greenhouse gases, mainly CO2, has resulted in an inexorable rise in the surface temperature of the Earth. ... All of the discussions seem to assume that it is the amount of greenhouse gasses in the volume of the atmosphere which control the Earth's surface temperature. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • From global freezing to global scorching
    ... The hottest average temperature during this long period was about ... Without CO2 earth would have an average temperature of -20°C. ... policy of releasing more CO2 into the atmosphere and/or black dusting ... atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide in the ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Consensus or senseless con?
    ... CO2 concentrations are at a higher level than at any time in the last ... The average temperature of the planet is higher than at any time in the ... The rate of planetary termperature rise is many times higher than at any ... attempting to discern trends that may vary enormously over ten or hundreds of ...
    (talk.politics.guns)