Re: Why is mass^2 "proportional" to total angular momentum in mesons (Regge theory)?
- From: frank_k_sheldon@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:59:29 -0800 (PST)
On 20 Jan., 09:06, Mirror Space <Ino...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 19, 11:54 am, frank_k_shel...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Regge theory states that mass m and angular momentum J
are related by
m^2 ~ c+d*J
for mesons of similar properties. It s also states that this
has to do with the elongated shape of mesons.
Can somebody explain this in simple physics?
I do not seem to find a simple explanation on the
internet - only research papers.
Thanks in advance!
Frank
Hi Frank it is not obeyed this relation anymore!
You should look into my seminal papers, like Physical Review D, v.63,
054023
(2001), and also my sole Review at ArXiv: hep-ph/0110160 - 90 pages,
where you will find REAL answers to all your queries!
Sincerely Andy Inopin, PhD from 1983
Well, as I said, I do not seem to find a simple explanation.
This review is another example of complicated explanations
for a simple fact.
It may well be that the relation is not exactly linear.
But why is it almost linear in the first place?
Frnk
.
- References:
- Why is mass^2 "proportional" to total angular momentum in mesons (Regge theory)?
- From: frank_k_sheldon
- Re: Why is mass^2 "proportional" to total angular momentum in mesons (Regge theory)?
- From: Mirror Space
- Why is mass^2 "proportional" to total angular momentum in mesons (Regge theory)?
- Prev by Date: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
- Next by Date: hypothesis > accepted theory?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is mass^2 "proportional" to total angular momentum in mesons (Regge theory)?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is mass^2 "proportional" to total angular momentum in mesons (Regge theory)?
- Index(es):