Re: Is special relativity falsifiable?
From: Androcles (androc1es_at_nospamblueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 06/04/04
- Next message: Daniel Weston: "Re: Where is the Transition Zone Between GR and QM?"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: Perception of reality is not the same as reality"
- In reply to: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Is special relativity falsifiable?"
- Next in thread: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Is special relativity falsifiable?"
- Reply: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Is special relativity falsifiable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:22:51 GMT
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:nPWvc.143817$hP6.7482479@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
|
| "Androcles" <androc1es@nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:m3Wvc.60$%g1.739331@news-text.cableinet.net...
| >
| > "Perfectly Innocent" <perfectlyInnocent@as-if.com> wrote in message
| > news:c45b45b3.0406032042.55b83ac2@posting.google.com...
|
| [snip]
|
| > This is physics:
| > http://www.androc1es.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/actual_data.htm
| > Androcles
|
| FYI:
| Androcles, Shubert is not a physicist. He is some sort of
| amateur mathematician.
| Shubert, Androcles is an imbecile. Don't discuss physics
| with him. Just try his ability on
| square roots:
| http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SqrtAnswers.html
| or exclusive ors:
| http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Gibberish.html
| or partial differential equations:
| http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff.html
| http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff2.html
| http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff3.html
| or just on equations:
| http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Think.html
|
| You'll love it.
| We will sit back and smile.
|
| Dirk Vdm
This is from Spermless Dinky the Deranged:
http://www.androc1es.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ImmortalFumble.htm
You'll hate it.
We will lean forward and puke.
There is not much else to say about him, he doesn't discuss relativity, it
frightens him. He has a faithful following of morons, most of whom are
slightly more intelligent than he is, i.e. on a par with the species
"gorilla gorrilla". He doesn't know sqrt(x) has two solutions, it has to be
written -sqrt(x) and +sqrt(x) for him to realize it.
His only function is to ridicule others, in violation of the s.p.r. charter.
It is unknown who castrated the eunuch, but obviously that has him
disgruntled.
Androcles
- Next message: Daniel Weston: "Re: Where is the Transition Zone Between GR and QM?"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: Perception of reality is not the same as reality"
- In reply to: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Is special relativity falsifiable?"
- Next in thread: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Is special relativity falsifiable?"
- Reply: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Is special relativity falsifiable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
