Re: Ampere's law proves reality of magnetic field
From: OC (o.chiatti_at_rhul.ac.uk)
Date: 06/07/04
- Next message: chaverondier: "Re: Why LET Is Superior to SR!"
- Previous message: kenseto: "Re: MMX and FORs Revisited"
- In reply to: Bilge: "Re: Ampere's law proves reality of magnetic field"
- Next in thread: Harold Ensle: "Re: Ampere's law proves reality of magnetic field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 7 Jun 2004 06:18:20 -0700
dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net (Bilge) wrote in message news:<slrncc8j4g.644.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net>...
> OC:
>
> [*verbose, content free, narrative, snipped*]
>
> <plonk>
As usual, when you realize that you cannot support your position with
proper arguments, you ignore what you do not like or run away.
You really cannot admit when you are wrong, can you?
OC
- Next message: chaverondier: "Re: Why LET Is Superior to SR!"
- Previous message: kenseto: "Re: MMX and FORs Revisited"
- In reply to: Bilge: "Re: Ampere's law proves reality of magnetic field"
- Next in thread: Harold Ensle: "Re: Ampere's law proves reality of magnetic field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
