Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?

From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 06/08/04 

Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:42:56 -0000

 David Rutherford:
>Bilge wrote:

>> You asked me to give you an example of what what wrong with your
>> so-called theory. I did.
>
>No, you gave me a so-called example, which I showed was flawed.
 
  What you showed is that you have no idea what connection exists between
physics and the mathematics used to describe it. You also have done
as I predicted.

>> You think a metric with a signature of
>> (++++) describes this universe.
>
>You still haven't given me valid empirical evidence that it doesn't.
 
  You haven't derived the group of transformations based upon that metric
for me yet. Either you can or your cannot. If you can't, tough luck.

 

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?
    ... David Rutherford: ... >Bilge wrote: ... What you showed is that you have no idea what connection exists between ... If you can't, tough luck. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?
    ... David Rutherford: ... >Bilge wrote: ... What you showed is that you have no idea what connection exists between ... If you can't, tough luck. ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: stainless steel foil instead of copper for grounding Ham radio?
    ... Could I use thin stainless steel foil instead of copper foil in the ... if you have any water in the bilge and it's saline you certainly ... Higher resistance then the connection to the stainless back stay? ... Further if the plate is only acting as the ground plane in an antenna ...
    (rec.boats.cruising)
  • Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?
    ... David Rutherford: ... >Bilge wrote: ... >> facing backwards in time. ... >The signs in the signature represent the signs in the spacetime metric. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?
    ... David Rutherford: ... >Bilge wrote: ... >> facing backwards in time. ... >The signs in the signature represent the signs in the spacetime metric. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)