Re: Letter to CHRISTIAN SCIENCE CHURCH

From: RoyBoy (armageddon79_at_SPAMBAD.email.com)
Date: 06/09/04 

Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:07:16 -0400

"George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> "RoyBoy" <armageddon79@SPAMBAD.email.com> wrote in message
> news:2Dyxc.12063$XY6.1311447@read2.cgocable.net...
> > "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > [Hammond]
> > > "Evolutionists" will agree that the SPECIES
> > > Homo-Sapiens-sapiens (our species) appeared approximately
> > > 40,000 years ago (some people seem to be arguing
> > > maybe it was 100,000 years ago.. makes no difference
> > > to my theory). I use the figure 40K.
> > > OK, the Bible ("Religion") says that when the human
> > > brain was created the world was "created" since the
> > > brain forms the image that we call "reality".
> >
> > What verse says that?
>
> [Hammond]
> I'm interpreting the Bible for
> you, since you're unqualified to
> read it... you don't even know
> what the world "exegesis" means.

That is what I use dictionaries and the Internet for;
and I see nothing you have written which is exegesis
of the Bible, or anything else for that matter.

> You asked me for a "simple explanation"
> so this is it.

Yet you cannot even answer a simple question
as to what verse you are interpreting... so, yet again,
I cannot verify what you have asserted.

> If you want the complicated
> "proof" you'll have to read the website,
> but you seem to be unable to do that.
> You have to do one or the other,
> you can't have your cake and eat it too.

You just told me its not all there... that I would
need to go through your references to get full
explanations. Seems terribly lazy and disingenuous
of a person who is trying to put forward their
controversial point of view.

> > > This then
> > > was 40,000 years ago since thats when "our brain"
> > > came into existence, and the Bible calls that "Creation".
> >
> > What verse says that?
>
> [Hammond]
> I'm interpreting the Bible for
> you, since you're unqualified to
> read it... you don't even know
> what the world "exegesis" means.
> You asked me for a "simple explanation"
> so this is it. If you want the complicated
> "proof" you'll have to read the website,
> but you seem to be unable to do that.
> You have to do one or the other,
> you can't have your cake and eat it too.

Intellectual I routinely do. Going through things in
detail, then at a later point being told, or coming up
with a incisive statement which sums up a complex
idea/subject. Which aids you in explaining it to others,
and remembering the pertinent ideas yourself.

> > > And, the Bible refers to the first two Homo-Sapiens-sapiens
> > > as "Adam and Eve".
> >
> > What verse says 'homo-sapiens-sapiens'?
> > To merely use the term is to imply a nested
> > hierarchy created by evolution through time (reality),
> > prior to human brains getting creative and talkative...
> > I somehow doubt the Bible does any such thing.
>
> [Hammond]
> I'm interpreting the Bible for
> you, since you're unqualified to
> read it... you don't even know
> what the world "exegesis" means.
> You asked me for a "simple explanation"
> so this is it. If you want the complicated
> "proof" you'll have to read the website,
> but you seem to be unable to do that.
> You have to do one or the other,
> you can't have your cake and eat it too.

Coward.

> > > Now that's a simple "plain English" explanation.
> > > If you want to get technical with me, you'll have to go
> > > to school and learn something first.
> >
> > Or one can listen to people who know what they
> > are talking about, and can answer incisive questions,
> > rather than demeaning the intelligence of their audience
> > instead of answering them.
>
> [Hammond]
> I'm interpreting the Bible for
> you, since you're unqualified to
> read it... you don't even know
> what the world "exegesis" means.
> You asked me for a "simple explanation"
> so this is it. If you want the complicated
> "proof" you'll have to read the website,
> but you seem to be unable to do that.
> You have to do one or the other,
> you can't have your cake and eat it too.

Coward.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Letter to CHRISTIAN SCIENCE CHURCH
    ... > That is what I use dictionaries and the Internet for; ... >> you can't have your cake and eat it too. ... > Coward. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Eating matza the entire week of Pesach
    ... 16:3 Do not eat any leaven with it. ... This verse says to eat for six days. ... the torah does seem to describe things relatively, ... But, I don't mind, since I have a Drash. ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Re: Greetings! New to the diabetic newsgroup!
    ... :>12:07PM 109 Ate a piece of cake, to keep me from going too low ... :>6:36PM 88 Ate chop suey and drank a regular Coke ... As to what to eat - experiment. ... lows and do not need to be corrected. ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Re: Commuter food use
    ... fuel food - thats the sort of food that makes me feel better for an ... I'd eat a bowl of cereal before setting off and another on arrival, ... Large portions of normal foods at lunch and supper and cake at teatime. ... If I eat sufficient in the morning to stop the hunger I feel bloated and sick and it greatly affects my ride! ...
    (uk.rec.cycling)
  • Re: Atkins news link
    ... those no-no's for diabetics is "i can't eat that ... but i can eat some with dinner tomorrow ... they are into Thai food. ... > me a big fancy black-forest cake. ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)