Re: Co-ordinate Time Vs. Real Time
From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 06/09/04
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: Why LET Is Superior to SR!"
- Previous message: Paul B. Andersen: "Re: The concept of time contractrion in special relativity"
- In reply to: Mitchell: "Re: Co-ordinate Time Vs. Real Time"
- Next in thread: Mitchell: "Re: Co-ordinate Time Vs. Real Time"
- Reply: Mitchell: "Re: Co-ordinate Time Vs. Real Time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:07:07 GMT
"Mitchell" <macromitch@internetCDS.com> wrote in message news:9c3da975.0406091301.74c038cd@posting.google.com...
> "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<tVzxc.3212$SS.1891@news.cpqcorp.net>...
> > "Mitchell" <macromitch@internetCDS.com> wrote in message news:9c3da975.0406082118.543297d0@posting.google.com...
> > > "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:<Geoxc.148900$ep7.7540839@phobos.telenet-ops.be>...
> > > > "Mitchell" <macromitch@internetCDS.com> wrote in message news:9c3da975.0406081038.48c4f52@posting.google.com...
> > > > > "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<40c5b21d@usenet01.boi.hp.com>...
> > > > > > "Mitchell" <macromitch@internetCDS.com> wrote in message news:9c3da975.0406071914.6cef3b7a@posting.google.com...
> > > >
> > > > [snip]
> > > >
> > > > > > > -- Light falls --
> > > > > > > -- Go To Hell --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't really believe in hell, but I see many good questions
> > > > > > in your post.
> > > > > > I can answer them, but I will not unless you convince me
> > > > > > that you are really interested and that you are prepared
> > > > > > to listen.
> > > > > > You start with pointing out the typo that I made in that
> > > > > > example
> > > > > > You know where to find me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dirk Vdm
> > > > > How do we find a correct way to represent time in gravity?
> > > > > How do we know if we have acomplished this?
> > > >
> > > > Excellent questions, but I repeat:
> > > >
> > > > I can answer them, but I will not unless you convince me
> > > > that you are really interested and that you are prepared
> > > > to listen.
> > > > You start with pointing out the typo that I made in that
> > > > example
> > > > You know where to find me.
> > > >
> > > > Dirk Vdm
> > > I am prepared only to ask questions. I can give you nothing more.
> >
> > Perhaps you don't know what a logarithm is.
> > That would explain almost everything.
> > Don't you know logarithms?
> >
> > Dirk Vdm
>
> They represent an exponential relationship between numbers.
>
> I guess you are implying that they relate to co-ordinates?
No, not at all.
Your refusal to do the little exercise and to comment on
the example made me wonder whether you have *any*
background in mathematics.
Dirk Vdm
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: Why LET Is Superior to SR!"
- Previous message: Paul B. Andersen: "Re: The concept of time contractrion in special relativity"
- In reply to: Mitchell: "Re: Co-ordinate Time Vs. Real Time"
- Next in thread: Mitchell: "Re: Co-ordinate Time Vs. Real Time"
- Reply: Mitchell: "Re: Co-ordinate Time Vs. Real Time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
