Re: Letter to CHRISTIAN SCIENCE CHURCH

From: RoyBoy (armageddon79_at_SPAMBAD.email.com)
Date: 06/10/04 

Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 21:28:31 -0400

"George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> "RoyBoy" <armageddon79@SPAMBAD.email.com> wrote in message
> news:8IFxc.8446$_V4.3056@read1.cgocable.net...
> > "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > "RoyBoy" <armageddon79@SPAMBAD.email.com> wrote in message
> > > news:2Dyxc.12063$XY6.1311447@read2.cgocable.net...
> > > > "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > [Hammond]
> > > > > "Evolutionists" will agree that the SPECIES
> > > > > Homo-Sapiens-sapiens (our species) appeared approximately
> > > > > 40,000 years ago (some people seem to be arguing
> > > > > maybe it was 100,000 years ago.. makes no difference
> > > > > to my theory). I use the figure 40K.
> > > > > OK, the Bible ("Religion") says that when the human
> > > > > brain was created the world was "created" since the
> > > > > brain forms the image that we call "reality".
> > > >
> > > > What verse says that?
> > >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > I'm interpreting the Bible for
> > > you, since you're unqualified to
> > > read it... you don't even know
> > > what the world "exegesis" means.
> >
> > That is what I use dictionaries and the Internet for;
> > and I see nothing you have written which is exegesis
> > of the Bible, or anything else for that matter.
> >
> > > You asked me for a "simple explanation"
> > > so this is it.
> >
> > Yet you cannot even answer a simple question
> > as to what verse you are interpreting... so, yet again,
> > I cannot verify what you have asserted.
> >
> > > If you want the complicated
> > > "proof" you'll have to read the website,
> > > but you seem to be unable to do that.
> > > You have to do one or the other,
> > > you can't have your cake and eat it too.
> >
> > You just told me its not all there... that I would
> > need to go through your references to get full
> > explanations. Seems terribly lazy and disingenuous
> > of a person who is trying to put forward their
> > controversial point of view.
> >
> > > > > This then
> > > > > was 40,000 years ago since thats when "our brain"
> > > > > came into existence, and the Bible calls that "Creation".
> > > >
> > > > What verse says that?
> > >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > I'm interpreting the Bible for
> > > you, since you're unqualified to
> > > read it... you don't even know
> > > what the world "exegesis" means.
> > > You asked me for a "simple explanation"
> > > so this is it. If you want the complicated
> > > "proof" you'll have to read the website,
> > > but you seem to be unable to do that.
> > > You have to do one or the other,
> > > you can't have your cake and eat it too.
> >
> > Intellectual I routinely do. Going through things in
> > detail, then at a later point being told, or coming up
> > with a incisive statement which sums up a complex
> > idea/subject. Which aids you in explaining it to others,
> > and remembering the pertinent ideas yourself.
> >
> > > > > And, the Bible refers to the first two Homo-Sapiens-sapiens
> > > > > as "Adam and Eve".
> > > >
> > > > What verse says 'homo-sapiens-sapiens'?
> > > > To merely use the term is to imply a nested
> > > > hierarchy created by evolution through time (reality),
> > > > prior to human brains getting creative and talkative...
> > > > I somehow doubt the Bible does any such thing.
> > >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > I'm interpreting the Bible for
> > > you, since you're unqualified to
> > > read it... you don't even know
> > > what the world "exegesis" means.
> > > You asked me for a "simple explanation"
> > > so this is it. If you want the complicated
> > > "proof" you'll have to read the website,
> > > but you seem to be unable to do that.
> > > You have to do one or the other,
> > > you can't have your cake and eat it too.
> >
> > Coward.
> >
> > > > > Now that's a simple "plain English" explanation.
> > > > > If you want to get technical with me, you'll have to go
> > > > > to school and learn something first.
> > > >
> > > > Or one can listen to people who know what they
> > > > are talking about, and can answer incisive questions,
> > > > rather than demeaning the intelligence of their audience
> > > > instead of answering them.
> > >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > I'm interpreting the Bible for
> > > you, since you're unqualified to
> > > read it... you don't even know
> > > what the world "exegesis" means.
> > > You asked me for a "simple explanation"
> > > so this is it. If you want the complicated
> > > "proof" you'll have to read the website,
> > > but you seem to be unable to do that.
> > > You have to do one or the other,
> > > you can't have your cake and eat it too.
> >
> > Coward.
>
> [Hammond]
> You're failing to get my attention BugleBoy

Your vacuous responses say otherwise PasteBoy,
and you're failing to answer my simple questions...
what verse, where's the reconciliation of evolution
and creation?

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Letter to CHRISTIAN SCIENCE CHURCH
    ... >> and I see nothing you have written which is exegesis ... or anything else for that matter. ... >> with a incisive statement which sums up a complex ... >> Coward. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... > George Hammond wrote: ... a coward and a moron compared to me. ... >>THAT is the reason you have such a bizzare reaction ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)