Re: Letter to CHRISTIAN SCIENCE CHURCH

From: ZenIsWhen (ZenIsWhen_at_anywhere.com)
Date: 06/10/04 

Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:16:01 -0400

"George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:HUKxc.5688$jw.4871@attbi_s04...
>
> "RoyBoy" <armageddon79@SPAMBAD.email.com> wrote in message
> news:8IFxc.8446$_V4.3056@read1.cgocable.net...
> > "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > "RoyBoy" <armageddon79@SPAMBAD.email.com> wrote in message
> > > news:2Dyxc.12063$XY6.1311447@read2.cgocable.net...
> > > > "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > [Hammond]
> > > > > "Evolutionists" will agree that the SPECIES
> > > > > Homo-Sapiens-sapiens (our species) appeared approximately
> > > > > 40,000 years ago (some people seem to be arguing
> > > > > maybe it was 100,000 years ago.. makes no difference
> > > > > to my theory). I use the figure 40K.
> > > > > OK, the Bible ("Religion") says that when the human
> > > > > brain was created the world was "created" since the
> > > > > brain forms the image that we call "reality".
> > > >
> > > > What verse says that?
> > >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > I'm interpreting the Bible for
> > > you, since you're unqualified to
> > > read it... you don't even know
> > > what the world "exegesis" means.
> >
> > That is what I use dictionaries and the Internet for;
> > and I see nothing you have written which is exegesis
> > of the Bible, or anything else for that matter.
> >
> > > You asked me for a "simple explanation"
> > > so this is it.
> >
> > Yet you cannot even answer a simple question
> > as to what verse you are interpreting... so, yet again,
> > I cannot verify what you have asserted.
> >
> > > If you want the complicated
> > > "proof" you'll have to read the website,
> > > but you seem to be unable to do that.
> > > You have to do one or the other,
> > > you can't have your cake and eat it too.
> >
> > You just told me its not all there... that I would
> > need to go through your references to get full
> > explanations. Seems terribly lazy and disingenuous
> > of a person who is trying to put forward their
> > controversial point of view.
> >
> > > > > This then
> > > > > was 40,000 years ago since thats when "our brain"
> > > > > came into existence, and the Bible calls that "Creation".
> > > >
> > > > What verse says that?
> > >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > I'm interpreting the Bible for
> > > you, since you're unqualified to
> > > read it... you don't even know
> > > what the world "exegesis" means.
> > > You asked me for a "simple explanation"
> > > so this is it. If you want the complicated
> > > "proof" you'll have to read the website,
> > > but you seem to be unable to do that.
> > > You have to do one or the other,
> > > you can't have your cake and eat it too.
> >
> > Intellectual I routinely do. Going through things in
> > detail, then at a later point being told, or coming up
> > with a incisive statement which sums up a complex
> > idea/subject. Which aids you in explaining it to others,
> > and remembering the pertinent ideas yourself.
> >
> > > > > And, the Bible refers to the first two Homo-Sapiens-sapiens
> > > > > as "Adam and Eve".
> > > >
> > > > What verse says 'homo-sapiens-sapiens'?
> > > > To merely use the term is to imply a nested
> > > > hierarchy created by evolution through time (reality),
> > > > prior to human brains getting creative and talkative...
> > > > I somehow doubt the Bible does any such thing.
> > >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > I'm interpreting the Bible for
> > > you, since you're unqualified to
> > > read it... you don't even know
> > > what the world "exegesis" means.
> > > You asked me for a "simple explanation"
> > > so this is it. If you want the complicated
> > > "proof" you'll have to read the website,
> > > but you seem to be unable to do that.
> > > You have to do one or the other,
> > > you can't have your cake and eat it too.
> >
> > Coward.
> >
> > > > > Now that's a simple "plain English" explanation.
> > > > > If you want to get technical with me, you'll have to go
> > > > > to school and learn something first.
> > > >
> > > > Or one can listen to people who know what they
> > > > are talking about, and can answer incisive questions,
> > > > rather than demeaning the intelligence of their audience
> > > > instead of answering them.
> > >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > I'm interpreting the Bible for
> > > you, since you're unqualified to
> > > read it... you don't even know
> > > what the world "exegesis" means.
> > > You asked me for a "simple explanation"
> > > so this is it. If you want the complicated
> > > "proof" you'll have to read the website,
> > > but you seem to be unable to do that.
> > > You have to do one or the other,
> > > you can't have your cake and eat it too.
> >
> > Coward.
>
> [Hammond]
> You're failing to get my attention BugleBoy

IOW ........... "I'll play all the silly assed, ignorant, corrupt games in
the world - but I'll NEVER give an honest. honrable and science based
response"!

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Suppose there was never an Ed Blum...
    ... No matter how many socks you use, you coward, you're still a pansy ... we know a chickenhawk like you was never in the military even during Vietnam. ... Join Halliburton to support the troops? ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: OT: Moon rock in Dutch museum is petrified wood
    ... him a coward and a liar' etc. ... controls everything right down to every local police sgt., prosecutor and judge, everywhere--just as they control the space agencies of Russia and Japan so they pretend to have photographed the hardware left at the Moon landing sites. ... That's what I mean about the beauty of this sort of delusional fantasy, it's self-repairing, able to withstand any amount of evidence because there's always a fallback position no matter how tiny and absurd it might be. ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: MAYBE it exists.
    ... Could it really be a coward? ... It does not matter if you are using mathematics, ... modelling, or voodoo. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Letter to CHRISTIAN SCIENCE CHURCH
    ... "George Hammond" wrote in message ... >> and I see nothing you have written which is exegesis ... >> Coward. ... and you're failing to answer my simple questions... ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: MAYBE it exists.
    ... Could it really be a coward? ... It does not matter if you are using mathematics, ... modelling, or voodoo. ...
    (sci.physics)