Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv
From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/10/04
- Next message: Tom Van Flandern: "Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- In reply to: Michael Varney: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Next in thread: Michael Varney: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Reply: Michael Varney: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Reply: Peter J Ross: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:20:48 GMT
"Michael Varney" <varney@colorado_no_spam.edu> wrote in message
news:%TKxc.93$hs.40238@news.uswest.net...
>
> "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:P9Ixc.5322$jw.4923@attbi_s04...
> >
> > "Michael Varney" <varney@colorado_no_spam.edu> wrote in message
> > news:pEExc.6$hs.14946@news.uswest.net...
> > >
> > > "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:TAExc.19768$HG.4234@attbi_s53...
> > > >
> > > > "Michael Varney" <varney@colorado_no_spam.edu> wrote in message
> > > > news:iHxxc.414$uc7.80813@news.uswest.net...
> > > > >
> > > > > "wbarwell" <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:40c65050$0$17096$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.com...
> > > > > > George Hammond wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Joe Cosby" <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl> wrote in
message
> > > > > > > news:qdqbc0tdpetqc71pim6t5brake6inf7tm1@4ax.com...
> > > > > > >> On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 13:43:34 GMT, "George Hammond"
> > > > > > >> <research137@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >"Joe Cosby" <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl> wrote in
> message
> > > > > > >> >news:f5k9c09ot4qpjbqhu0a95el3idq7tujrfr@4ax.com...
> > > > > > >> >> On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 20:26:10 GMT, "George Hammond"
> > > > > > >> >> <research137@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> >To find an axiomatic physics theory confirmed by
> > > > > > >> >> >experimental evidence that explains EVERYTHING
> > > > > > >> >> >in that history and structure of Religion
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> But again, you haven't drawn any coherent relation between
> the
> > > > two.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [Hammond]
> > > > > > > Bull***... you haven't read it, thats all:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A. It is canonical physics that the brain forms a
> > > > > > > "1:1 image of reality" in our mind.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is wrong in so many way, on so many levels,
> > > > > > so badly wrong, its hard to think of an easy way to
> > > > > > discuss this wrongness adequately.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is not even wrong.
> > > >
> > > > [Hammond]
> > > > Horse***.
> > >
> > > I stand corrected... your theory is not even wrong horse***. Thank
for
> > the
> > > correction, Hammered.
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > We're getting a rough estimate of just how
> > ignorant and unoriginal you are.... simply from
> > the fact that you have posted 100 cvomments to my
> > discussion of GOD=G_uv and have YET to say
> > anything containing physics substance.
>
> There is no physics content in your posts, Hammond.
[Hammond]
Unsupported assertion.
> The responses are
> commensurate.
[Hammond]
Unsupported assertion.
>
>
> > Apparently Poster Boy is just a small minded
> > heckler.
> > BTW; Jim Jastrzebski who is a competent physicist,
> > is of the opinion that my theory
> > is CORRECT and to put it in his own words:
> >
> > "God is a curvature in psychometry space".
> > (J. Jastrzebski, physicist)
>
> Never heard of him. In any event, he is most likely lampooning you.
>
[Hammond]
Unsupported assertion.
>
> > I consider this a key testimonial and far more worthwhile
> > than anything you have ever said.
> > You may be wondering why Jastrzebsi would be the only
> > one to comprehend the theory. First he's a physicist.
> > Second his mother was Jewish and his father a German officer
> > in the occupation army in Poland during WWII. He escaped
> > from Poland when he was a kid.
>
> Who cares?
[Hammond]
That's certainly none of your business.
>
>
> > This is why
> > he understands what "psychology" is, and is able to
> > recognize a credible explanation of God when he
> > sees one. He's a veteran. On top of that, he personally is a dead
> > ringer for Steven Segal, which is a strong recommendation
> > in and of itself.
>
> Well *** Hammond, you have convinced me that this guy knows what he is
> talking about because he looks like Steven Segal.
[Hammond]
My picture is on the Internet. His picture is
on the internet.
WHERE'S YOUR PICTURE POSTER BOY?
Or are we talking to a faceless heckle-bot?
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
- Next message: Tom Van Flandern: "Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- In reply to: Michael Varney: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Next in thread: Michael Varney: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Reply: Michael Varney: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Reply: Peter J Ross: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]