Re: OT: Riddle for the bright minds here
From: Androcles (androc1es_at_nospamblueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 06/11/04
- Next message: sal: "Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? (returning to the topic)"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: The concept of time contractrion in special relativity"
- In reply to: sal: "Re: OT: Riddle for the bright minds here"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: OT: Riddle for the bright minds here"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:57:26 GMT
"sal" <believer@nospam.org> wrote in message
news:c3b1113922bb94f09466e42d5604d2a1@news.teranews.com...
| On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:04:43 +0000, Androcles wrote:
|
| > |
| > | Yes but that last line is important. You can build all the logical
| > | operators, including 'not' and 'or', out of 'xor' and 'and'.
| >
| > You can build XOR out of NAND, which were the early and most common TTL
| > gates, 4 to a chip. NAND lent itself readily with TTL. High voltage at
the
| > base is low voltage at the collector.
| >
| > | That isn't
| > | true of 'or' and 'and', just because that last line is different.
| >
| > Sure you can, but that is wasting the gates and slows the system. Tie
one
| > input of a NAND gate to high...
|
| But that's a NAND gate, which incorporates a NOT. As I said, you can't do
| it with plain AND and OR, afaik. There's no way to make NOT with them.
I didn't deny it, did I?
I was just being practical, that's all.
|
| XOR and AND => you can make the complete set
|
| AND and NOT => you can make the complete set
|
| OR and NOT => you can make the complete set
|
| NAND alone => you can make the complete set
Lovely, isn't it? There is beauty in that. Edge-triggered flip flops out of
NAND. voila! memory! Half-adders out of NAND. Arithemetic!
|
| Just AND and OR => you need a separate NOT gate
|
| But AND gates are kind of unphysical, aren't they?
Is that Sirvent the Unscientific unphysical or physically unphysical?
Real gates are
| almost always NANDs, not ANDS. (Or has that changed with the advent of
| whatever magic they use to drive chips at 2+ GHz? I'm pretty out of
| date on the hardware end of things...)
|
|
| --
| To email me directly, take out nospam and put back physicsinsights
I think you can still get them at Radio Shack. AFAIK, the principles of
Boolean Algebra haven't changed even if the technology has.
Androcles
- Next message: sal: "Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? (returning to the topic)"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: The concept of time contractrion in special relativity"
- In reply to: sal: "Re: OT: Riddle for the bright minds here"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: OT: Riddle for the bright minds here"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|