Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv
From: Beable van Polasm (beable+unsenet_at_beable.com.invalid)
Date: 06/11/04
- Next message: Gerald L. O'Barr: "Re: Why LET Is Superior to SR!"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: A Letter to George Hammond, and all Christians for that matter."
- In reply to: Peter J Ross: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Next in thread: TMG: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Reply: TMG: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:08:14 GMT
Peter J Ross <gadfly@NOSPAMmeow.org> writes:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:20:48 GMT, George Hammond wrote:
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > Unsupported assertion.
>
> Wow. We may have a new David Tholen here, chaps!
What about this?
> > On top of that, he personally is a dead ringer for Steven Segal,
> > which is a strong recommendation in and of itself.
Surely he CAN'T be SERIOUS! I suggest somebody asks Steven Segal what
he thinks about Hammond's SPOG Theory.
And remember, all you SCIENTISTS in auk, you're only seeing the tip
of the iceberg here. If you want to get the full range of information
about Mr Hammond and his SPOG, you'll need to search further:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22george+hammond%22&scoring=d
--
Suppose you were a Ham radio operator in 1945 and heard Japanese
carriers talking about closing in on Pearl Harbor. -- George Hammond
http://beable.com
- Next message: Gerald L. O'Barr: "Re: Why LET Is Superior to SR!"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: A Letter to George Hammond, and all Christians for that matter."
- In reply to: Peter J Ross: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Next in thread: TMG: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Reply: TMG: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
