Re: Why LET Is Superior to SR!

From: Gerald L. O'Barr (globarr_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/11/04 

Date: 11 Jun 2004 16:14:20 -0700

"Robert J. Kolker" <robert_kolker@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<fWhyc.4738$zz.3164@attbi_s04>...
> Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > . . . Every time SR relationships are further
> > established or advanced, the ether theory becomes
> > stronger.
>
> Then why didn't MMX detect the aether?

Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr@yahoo.com> comments:
   The MMX, to the best that can be made of it,
perfectly and completely supports LET, and thus,
scientifically, perfectly supports the existence
of the ether! QED! And if you want to ask this
same question again and again, as you are now
doing, it cannot change the science that is
involved, and has now been given to you
several different times by several
different peolpe.

Kolker wrote:
>Why do non aetheric theories predict so well?

O'Barr comments:
   By non ether theories, I assume you mean SR.
SR did not base anything upon there being no
ether. In fact, SR assumed a reality that
perfectly matched what was previously established
by Lorentz. Einstein assumed that the measured
speed of light would be a constant, exactly as
Lorentz showed in his theory. Therefore, if you
assume the same things that an absolute ether
requires, how could you not come up with the
same math? So SR is ether math, and that is
why it works so well. And I am sure you knew
all this! So again, why do you ask these same
questions over and over?

Thanks for reading.
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr@yahoo.com>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
    ... >> Citation for aether theories that did account for MMX, ... > Are you saying that no ether theories prior to MMX could ... Not according to the Relativists in this newsgroup. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
    ... >> What are the properties of this true luminiferous aether? ... > The ether is universal, that means, not only EM waves ... > laws in a variant of the Noether theorem. ... > That's the most primitive variant of ether theory, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
    ... What term should I used to distinguish ether theories formulated ... >> account for null MMX? ... prior to MMX the Lorentz transform was unknown. ... > Using fringe shifts. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
    ... >> ether theries that did not account for a null MMX from those that did. ... QM has been absorbed by QFT in order to include relativity, ... whereas the proton is about a thousand times heavier. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The whole of Maxwells Theory is Meaningless
    ... >And the null result of the MMX showed him to be mistaken. ... in which case MMX showed there was no ether. ... If you are trying to use MMX to justify the second postulate it is ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)