Re: These are Quotes "By George"
From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/12/04
- Next message: Patrick Reany: "Re: Why LET Is Superior to SR!"
- Previous message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: My clock refuses to obey SR's time dilation!"
- In reply to: TMG: "Re: These are Quotes "By George""
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: These are Quotes "By George""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 13:58:33 GMT
"TMG" <TMG@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:S4SdnbFhNfqQ6lfdRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
> Earle Jones wrote:
>
> > In article <7%lxc.20210$Sw.8884@attbi_s51>,
> > "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>"Goran Dhemmeog" <hcraeser731@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:b9eccd47.0406080317.792fe553@posting.google.com...
> >>
> >>
> >>>Some things are for George just "facts". A George-fact is something
> >>>that is "manifestly true", cannot be or do not need to be proven. They
> >>>are however not axioms -just true, almost tautologies. Some
> >>>George-facts are:
> >>
> >>>-All animals have [a minimum of] 4 legs.
> >>>-4-D of physical space causes 4-D in psychometric space.
> >>>-Perceptual reality is the same as physical reality.
> >>>-There is a growth deficit in the human brain.
> >>>-The growth of the human brain has a secular trend.
> >>>-There is 100 years of psychometric evidence to SPOG.
> >>>-God = G_uv.
> >>>-etc.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >><snip>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>This is why
> >>>there are no supporters for SPOG. Have you observed that no-one, not
> >>>one person, anywhere (except Jim with his own crackpot theory)
> >>>beleives in SPOG.
> >>
> >>[Hammond]
> >>LIAR.... what about this glowing testimonial posted
> >>just a few days ago by Gilbert Cloutier:
> >>
> >>-----------------------------------------------------------
> >>"Gilbert Cloutier" <cloutierexpress@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:f1da7d36.0405291305.6c7d9808@posting.google.com...
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hammond, you are by all means a true scientiest...
> >
> >
> > *
> > Hammond, it might be a good idea if you were to give some guidance
> > to your sockpuppets. For example, at least have them spell
> > 'scientist' correctly.
> >
> > Jesus!!
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
> As sad as it is, Hammond won't understand what you're saying. He can't
> process at this level, and it all sounds like a BUZZZZZZ to him. Basic
> math, physics, human interaction, being a person - all lost.
BUZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
[Hammond]
And then Earle.... there are spammers like this guy (TMG)
who not only make posts about typos.. but even
comment on comments about typos. Bandwidth wasting
heckle-bot posting by people who have nothing on topic
or content containing to say. Career psychopathic heckle-bots.
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
>
- Next message: Patrick Reany: "Re: Why LET Is Superior to SR!"
- Previous message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: My clock refuses to obey SR's time dilation!"
- In reply to: TMG: "Re: These are Quotes "By George""
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: These are Quotes "By George""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
