SPOG IS FUBAR
From: Gwar (xeno_at_xor.qua)
Date: 06/12/04
- Next message: Alfred Einstead: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: The scientific method as understood by relativists"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: A Letter to George Hammond, and all Christians for that matter."
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: SPOG IS FUBAR"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: SPOG IS FUBAR"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:08:33 -0700
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, George Hammond wrote:
> [Hammond]
> "In reality" the Universe is older than 40,000
> years, but HUMAN REALITY IS NOT.
> Since the Universe is 15-billion years old
> "within Reality".... we see that it was
> nevertheless "Created 40,000 years ago"
> when "reality" was created.
Humans didn't initiate their reality.
> To say "It existed" 15 billion years ago... "tacitly assumes" the
> existence of a "hypothetical human observer". But in fact.... that
> assumption is FALSE.
To say that the universe is 15 billion years old is to say that it existed
15 billion years ago. It has nothing to do with imagining a human
observer, or any observer, or assuming that the universe is a creation.
- Next message: Alfred Einstead: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: The scientific method as understood by relativists"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: A Letter to George Hammond, and all Christians for that matter."
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: SPOG IS FUBAR"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: SPOG IS FUBAR"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
