Re: Newton was a fake
From: Bill Hobba (bhobba_at_rubbish.net.au)
Date: 06/13/04
- Next message: ZenIsWhen: "Re: A Letter to George Hammond, and all Christians for that matter."
- Previous message: John Kennaugh: "Re: Electron-positron annihilation"
- In reply to: Dnlzmmr: "Re: Newton was a fake"
- Next in thread: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Newton was a fake"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 23:42:53 GMT
"Dnlzmmr" <dnlzmmr@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040613182140.24870.00000627@mb-m21.aol.com...
> >You're right of course. But my first reply was sarcastic. So I thought
> >something more intelligent was better.
> >
>
> By the way, I figured out how gravity works. First, here is my definition
of
> energy: an increase of energy is a weakening of bonds.
Physics is not about the definition of things you pull out of a hat - that
this is definitely not what physics is discussed in volume 1 of the Feynman
Lectures on Physics. In modern parlance energy is the conserved Noether
current related to time symmetry see
http://www.physics.ucla.edu/~cwp/Phase2/Noether,_Amalie_Emmy@861234567.html
'The key to the relation of symmetry laws to conservation laws is Emmy
Noether's celebrated Theorem. ... Before Noether's Theorem the principle of
conservation of energy was shrouded in mystery, leading to the obscure
physical systems of Mach and Ostwald. Noether's simple and profound
mathematical formulation did much to demystify physics'
> For instance, an
> increase of thermal energy is a weakening of chemical bonds.
Wrong.
> Gravity is a type of bond. An increase of kinetic energy is a weakening of
> gravity bonds.
Wrong.
> So when velocity goes up, weight goes down.
When velocity goes up kinetic energy goes up and potential energy goes down
so that potential and kinetic energy remain constant. Why is this a
constant? - Noethers theorem.
> You can read my essay A New Gravity Theory on my website
> http://hometown.aol.com/dnlzmmr/
You obviously have no idea what your talking about - as I said in general
terms energy in the conserved Noether current related to time symmetry. And
if that is beyond you then I suggest reading the Feynman Lectures on Physics
then Landau Mechanics.
Bill
- Next message: ZenIsWhen: "Re: A Letter to George Hammond, and all Christians for that matter."
- Previous message: John Kennaugh: "Re: Electron-positron annihilation"
- In reply to: Dnlzmmr: "Re: Newton was a fake"
- Next in thread: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Newton was a fake"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
