Re: ANCIENT EGYPT- GOD=G_uv
From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/16/04
- Next message: Paul B. Andersen: "Re: Funny: Einstein-Euclidean space?"
- Previous message: Jon Hurwitz: "Re: Christoffel Symbol and Riemann Curvature Tensor"
- Maybe in reply to: George Hammond: "ANCIENT EGYPT- GOD=G_uv"
- Next in thread: Joe Cosby: "Re: ANCIENT EGYPT- GOD=G_uv"
- Reply: Joe Cosby: "Re: ANCIENT EGYPT- GOD=G_uv"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 20:38:03 GMT
"Joe Cosby" <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl> wrote in message
news:b171d0tsekptfgsc0searmkdd3ls9jp17e@4ax.com...
> Last warning
>
> >Second warning
> >
> >>
> >>Stop spamming before I contact your ISP, you gibbering loon.
> >>
> >>X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
> >>
> >
>
[Hammond]
What's your problem?
False charge of SPAMMING against Hammond:
(note, I am indebted to H.E. Retic for composing the
following statement, which I feel adequately
describes my situation also... the statment has been
edited to fit my particular situation)
Joe Cosby has accused Hammond of SPAM posting.
The writer's postings are carefully constructed so as remain within the
commonly accepted rules concerning SPAM, to wit:
1. Postings of essentially identical material shall not be made to more than
eight Newsgroups. The writer has limited his postings to five Newsgroups.
2. Postings of essentially identical material shall not be made more
frequently
than every 14 days. The writer's posting are separated by a longer time
span.
3. Postings shall be reasonably close to the topic to which the Newsgroups
is
dedicated. My postings are closer to being on topic for each Newsgroup than
are
most of the postings within that group.
4. The postings shall not be used for commercial purposes. They are not.
5. There shall be no alteration of the header material of the postings.
While
the postings are made under many different E-mail names, however AOL
provides
for multiple user names and permits them to be altered at will.
None of the writer's actions constitute SPAM as it is currently
defined.
The accusations that the writer is a SPAMMER can reasonably considered to be
the slanderous behavior of sick minds. My postings are to de facto public
newsgroups which, as such, cannot limit their postings to material that
agrees
with the majority viewpoint and still retain their legitimacy. That type of
censorship is legitimate only when done by moderated groups. To avoid this
censorship, the writer has made use of IE's useful capability of allowing
user
name changes. (It has been alleged that such changes are the characteristic
of
a "crank". They are not, they are the response of any reasonable individual
whose ideas are being suppressed.) 50% of all internet posters use
"internet handle's" instead of their real names. 99.99% of my postings
are under my real name.
The writer concludes that the strident protest against the writer's
postings can only result from fear, otherwise why wouldn't they just be
ignored
if the content were thought not to be valid. After all, there are many more
foolish postings than mine made to these Newsgroups without evoking
complaint.
The only reason for the complaints would seem to be that the complainer is
not
upset by the fact the posted material is "wrong",
>
> --
> Joe Cosby
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
- Next message: Paul B. Andersen: "Re: Funny: Einstein-Euclidean space?"
- Previous message: Jon Hurwitz: "Re: Christoffel Symbol and Riemann Curvature Tensor"
- Maybe in reply to: George Hammond: "ANCIENT EGYPT- GOD=G_uv"
- Next in thread: Joe Cosby: "Re: ANCIENT EGYPT- GOD=G_uv"
- Reply: Joe Cosby: "Re: ANCIENT EGYPT- GOD=G_uv"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
