Re: ANCIENT EGYPT- GOD=G_uv

From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/21/04 

Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:02:42 GMT

"TMG" <TMG@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:eNqdnbJfoqQKiUvdRVn-jw@comcast.com...
> Russell E. Rierson wrote:
>
> To begin, please understand the source:
>
> http://www.insolitology.com/mail/Rierson.htm
>
> Of course - Rierson could/may be a Hammond sock puppet.

[Hammond]
You might be a Hammond sock puppet too.

>
>
> > Interesting...
> >
> >
http://www.talkaboutreligion.com/group/alt.religion.new/messages/3521.html
> >
> > QUOTE:
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > Mary Baker Eddy founded the church in 1879 in Boston
> > as a "scientific" Church. Her "science of God"
> > amounted to the following:
> >
> > 1. "God is mind"
> > 2. "Heaven is a mental state"
> > 3. God is a perfect man with a perfect mind
> > 4. There is no perfect man on Earth
> >
> > Now, bear in mind, this is the first religion in
> > history to make an actual scientific statement about
> > what God is: It says, "God is mind".
> >
> > No other Religion on Earth makes such a statement.
> >
> > Jesus never made such a statement (although he did
> > say "God is a spirit" (Jn 4:24), which it turns out
> > as Hammond has now proved, is an equivalent statement).
> >
> > The scientific statement is original with Mary Baker
> > Eddy. (although some argue Bishop Berkeley published a
> > similar theory in 1710). Maybe he did, but he never
> > got a million followers to agree with him.
>
> And ~ 2 millon Americans think the earth is flat.
>
> > It turns out according to Hammond's discovery, that
> > Mary Baker Eddy is SCIENTIFICALLY CORRECT about her
> > scientific explanation of God. Absolutely correct!
> > And, now Hammond has discovered the explanation of
> > line 4 above:
> >
> > 5. The Secular Trend in human growth shows that
> > there is no such thing as a "fully grown man"
> > and this is the reason there is no "perfect man".
> >
> >
> > Hammond's discovery, GOD=G_uv, is an axiomatic,
> > experimentally confirmed discovery that God is
> > explained by the Secular Trend in Growth (braingrowth)
> > and that this causes a "curvature of perceptual reality"
> > called "GOD". Thus it proves that "God is mind"... a
> > "curvature of the mind" to be scientifically precise.
> > Christian Science it turns out is the massive
> > empirical confirmation of the SAME THEORY! Thus, we
> > have OVERWHELMING CONFIRMATION OF
> > HAMMOND'S DISCOVERY.
> >
> > The details of this exact concordance between Eddy and
> > Hammond is given at:
> >
> > http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/CS.html
> >
> > AT ANY RATE, a word to the wise should be sufficient.
> > Don't pay any attention to the thousands of hecklers
> > stalking Hammond, they are simply the "troops of error"
> > that follow every great pioneer.
>
> Meaning they follow scientific method, logic, rational thought, and
> don't smell like a homeless crank.
>
> > Hammond's "theory" has been PROVEN TRUE, not just by
> > laboratory psychometric data
>
> For a made up science, is the psychometric lab imaginary lab?

[Hammond]
Cattell's psychometry lab at U. Illinois (Urbana-Champaign)
was... and still is, world famous (he's dead now). I've heard
stories of them sitting there playing with the dials on the roto-plots
while making eigenvector rotations. It must have been heady stuff
when they were experimentally discovering the Structural
Model.... little did they know they were experimentally discovering the
world's first scientific proof of God. I've talked to one of his daughters
who is presently in charge of his library and testing lab.
  When I discovered the scientific proof of God using his data
during a blinding snowstorm in Feb. 1997.. I trudged 2 milesthru the
snow to the nearest mailbox at 3 am and put a letter to Cattell (then
90 and retired in Hawaii) about it in the mail box. Several weeks later
I got an incredulous letter from him... but at least he knew about it
before he died at 93 a few years later. He used to write me 5 page
hadwritten letters at the age of 92 giving me hell for not reading
all his books.

>
> > and Relativity, but by a
> > major religion, one of the most highly respected and
> > influential religions in the world!
>
> As has been pointed out, out of the modern "contrived" religions, The
> Church of Christ, Scientist, is pretty far down on the respect list -
> when the Mormans take up your cause, let us know.

[Hammond]
Intellectually speaking, and among the educated classes, the
Christian Science Church is far more prestigeous than the
Mormans... ("Moroni and the book of Mormon"... give me
a break). The Mormons may have more money... but the
CS Church is pretty well heeled too... Christian Science Plaza
in Boston must be worth a billion dollars alone. And the
Christian Science Monitor has won 7 Pulitzer Prizes...
probably more than any other newspaper.

> > It takes 2 people to make a motion.
>
> Actually, it takes a particle and a field....
>
> > One person to
> > make it and another to second it. HAMMOND and EDDY are
> > now 2-people who are saying the same thing...
>
> At least one of them are dead. You pick.
>
> > one by
> > "scientifically proving that GOD=G_uv" and the other by
> > "socially proving that God is mind". These two theories
> > are shown to be EXACTLY CONGRUENT AND IDENTICAL.
>
> I'm not sure how "socially proving" works, but the science and maths
> says Hammond is flat out wrong.

[Hammond]
LIAR... you can't point out one single
mathematical objection to my work..
you're a fraud.

>
> > Of
> > course Hammond's discovery being more modern, goes one
> > step further by proving exactly what it is about the
> > mind that causes "God", and why God is related to
> > General Relativity by the equation GOD=G_uv.
>
> Hammond has simply swapped "GOD" for the stress tensor that he doesn't
> understand. He seems to have a basic detachment from real physics.

[Hammond]
Moron. the "stress tensor" is the "source term" in
a differential equation.... standard mathematics.
It's the "source term" because its known that "mass
causes gravity". LIKEWISE in psychometry the
"braingrowth deficit" is the source term because it
is know (demonstrated) to be the cause of God.
Simple, BY THE BOOK, physics analysis... no
different than Quantum Theory, Particle Physics,
or any other standard historical physicis theory.

>
> > Therefore, its now time to face the fact that the
> > thousands of jeering hecklers stalking Hammond around
> > are WRONG and their opinions are MEANINGLESS, and that
> > they should be IGNORED.
>
> Make a physical, testable prediction that Hammond's theory uniquely
> predicts. Set up the bench test, test it, and publish the results.

[Hammond]
The theory is ALREADY EXPERIMENTALLY PROVED.
I'll say that again ***, so you won't keep mouthing
your litany of hearsay and cliches: the theory is
ALREADY EXPERIMENTALLY PROVED
by 100 years of "heretofore unpredicted and unexplained
psychometry data" which is
NOW EXPERIMENTALLY PREDICTED by the theory.

For chrissakes, when Dalton discovered the principle
of "atomic combination into molecules" as the basis of
Chemistry he didn't have to "make any predictions"
or "do any experiments" ASSHLOE.... there was already
200 years of unexplained experimental chemistry results sitting
on the shelf which his theory PREDICTED AND EXPLAINED.

SAME WITH THE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD

quit reciting your "buzzword nonsense" to us... its getting tedious.
Moron.

>
> If you can't devise a test, your/Hammond's theory is bogus.

[Hammond]
the test has already been devised and executed by
100 years of UNEXPLAINED, UNPREDICTED
psychometry results.... which
MY THEORY PREDICTS AND EXPLAINS
what the fcuk is wrong with you?

[Hammond]
ITS ALREADY SUCCESDSDFULLY PASSED THE TEST
WHAT THE FCUK'S WRONG WITH YOU?

> If you can't do the test, you/Hammond are a fraud.

[Hammond]
ITS ALREADY SUCCESDSDFULLY PASSED THE TEST
WHAT THE FCUK'S WRONG WITH YOU?

>
> Put up or shut up.

[Hammond]
ITS ALREADY SUCCESDSDFULLY PASSED THE TEST
WHAT THE FCUK'S WRONG WITH YOU?

====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================

Quantcast